IBJNews

St. Vincent Health names new CEO from Valparaiso

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The next CEO of Indianapolis-based St. Vincent Health will come from a for-profit hospital system in northwest Indiana.

Jonathan Nalli mugJonathan Nalli

Jonathan Nalli, 39, has been CEO since 2007 of Porter Health System, an affiliate of Tennessee-based Community Health Systems Inc. Based in Valparaiso, Porter operates two hospitals, six outpatient centers and numerous physician practices.

Nalli will become CEO of St. Vincent on Feb. 1, the hospital system announced Tuesday. The Indianapolis-based Catholic hospital system operates 22 hospitals around Indiana, employing about 16,500 people. It reported revenue of $2.8 billion in its most recent fiscal year.

St. Vincent is an affiliate of St. Louis-based Ascension Health, the nation’s largest Catholic hospital system.

He will replace Ian Worden, who has served as interim CEO since Vince Caponi stepped aside in July. Caponi remains executive chairman of the board for St. Vincent Health.
 
“As a proven healthcare executive with vast experience in growth management strategies, improvement plans and demonstrable results in achieving business objectives, we look forward to Jonathan leading the transformation of our business and building on the successes of our ministry,” said Caponi, in a prepared statement.
 
Before leading Porter Health, Nalli was chief operating officer of Chestnut Hill Health System in Philadelphia for two years. In addition, he served as chief operating officer of Pottstown Memorial Medical Center in Pottstown, Pa.
 
Nalli holds an MBA from Drexel University in Philadelphia, and his bachelor's of health sciences from the University of Kentucky.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • WHAT!!!
    It's always sad to see comments based on emotion rather than FACTS. Can you possibly imagine employing 16,000+ people with all levels of professional/service responsibilities without 'revenue' (monies received)? What about the equipment, maintenance, supplies, food, utilities & emergency generators (to name only a few) to sustain care and life benefits for patients? What about an Emergency Department that accepts ALL in need regardless of insurance or ability to pay (Obama's plan couldn't begin to be better than the Church!). Hope you can now understand the difference between revenue and profit. Do NOT allow the propaganda of populous thinking that all 'big business' is bad rule your emotions - that's what it preys on! Without sensible 'business' leaders there would be no employment, benefits, services, or prosperity to share through your tax benefits. Thank God we can still think for ourselves (though barely) and express our views - hopefully, it will encourage 'more though' and 'less follow' among the masses...
  • Shameful
    Just a few months ago this hospital laid off nearly 900 people - that's downsizing. Now they're talking about growth again. You can't have both growth and lose people. It just doesn't work that way. How much is this new CEO going to make??? They've got money for his salary but couldn't hang onto the people that were let go!!!
  • Non-profit hospital
    Someone please show me a true non-profit hospital. I don't understand why the IRS allows this to go on.
  • St. Dollar Sign
    “As a proven healthcare executive with vast experience in growth management strategies, improvement plans and demonstrable results in achieving business objectives..." ...is exactly what I do NOT want in my non-profit hospital!!! Getting further and further away from any faith-based health care provider by wanting to grow that $2.8 billion. Grrrrr

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT