IBJNews

St. Vincent Health names new CEO from Valparaiso

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The next CEO of Indianapolis-based St. Vincent Health will come from a for-profit hospital system in northwest Indiana.

Jonathan Nalli mugJonathan Nalli

Jonathan Nalli, 39, has been CEO since 2007 of Porter Health System, an affiliate of Tennessee-based Community Health Systems Inc. Based in Valparaiso, Porter operates two hospitals, six outpatient centers and numerous physician practices.

Nalli will become CEO of St. Vincent on Feb. 1, the hospital system announced Tuesday. The Indianapolis-based Catholic hospital system operates 22 hospitals around Indiana, employing about 16,500 people. It reported revenue of $2.8 billion in its most recent fiscal year.

St. Vincent is an affiliate of St. Louis-based Ascension Health, the nation’s largest Catholic hospital system.

He will replace Ian Worden, who has served as interim CEO since Vince Caponi stepped aside in July. Caponi remains executive chairman of the board for St. Vincent Health.
 
“As a proven healthcare executive with vast experience in growth management strategies, improvement plans and demonstrable results in achieving business objectives, we look forward to Jonathan leading the transformation of our business and building on the successes of our ministry,” said Caponi, in a prepared statement.
 
Before leading Porter Health, Nalli was chief operating officer of Chestnut Hill Health System in Philadelphia for two years. In addition, he served as chief operating officer of Pottstown Memorial Medical Center in Pottstown, Pa.
 
Nalli holds an MBA from Drexel University in Philadelphia, and his bachelor's of health sciences from the University of Kentucky.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • WHAT!!!
    It's always sad to see comments based on emotion rather than FACTS. Can you possibly imagine employing 16,000+ people with all levels of professional/service responsibilities without 'revenue' (monies received)? What about the equipment, maintenance, supplies, food, utilities & emergency generators (to name only a few) to sustain care and life benefits for patients? What about an Emergency Department that accepts ALL in need regardless of insurance or ability to pay (Obama's plan couldn't begin to be better than the Church!). Hope you can now understand the difference between revenue and profit. Do NOT allow the propaganda of populous thinking that all 'big business' is bad rule your emotions - that's what it preys on! Without sensible 'business' leaders there would be no employment, benefits, services, or prosperity to share through your tax benefits. Thank God we can still think for ourselves (though barely) and express our views - hopefully, it will encourage 'more though' and 'less follow' among the masses...
  • Shameful
    Just a few months ago this hospital laid off nearly 900 people - that's downsizing. Now they're talking about growth again. You can't have both growth and lose people. It just doesn't work that way. How much is this new CEO going to make??? They've got money for his salary but couldn't hang onto the people that were let go!!!
  • Non-profit hospital
    Someone please show me a true non-profit hospital. I don't understand why the IRS allows this to go on.
  • St. Dollar Sign
    “As a proven healthcare executive with vast experience in growth management strategies, improvement plans and demonstrable results in achieving business objectives..." ...is exactly what I do NOT want in my non-profit hospital!!! Getting further and further away from any faith-based health care provider by wanting to grow that $2.8 billion. Grrrrr

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

    2. Shouldn't this be a museum

    3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

    4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

    5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

    ADVERTISEMENT