IBJNews

St. Vincent settles class-action debt-collection case

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A federal judge on Friday approved a class-action settlement involving St. Vincent Hospital and the method it used to collect overdue payments.

The court awarded plaintiff Michael Sargent $2,000 as part of the lawsuit he brought against the hospital in October 2008. The class consisted of 21 parties that responded to the suit.

Sargent sued St. Vincent, claiming the hospital violated state debt-collection law by using St. Louis-based Outsource Group Inc., which was not licensed as a collection agency in Indiana.

Sargent’s suit was preceded by a court claim brought by Outsource in August 2008 in Marion Superior Court in an attempt to collect Sargent’s overdue payment.

Outsource filed the suit even though it did not own the account upon which Sargent was indebted and was not a licensed collection agency in Indiana, according to court documents.

The class of plaintiffs represented anyone sued by Outsource for a debt owed to St. Vincent, or any one of its entities, before Oct. 27, 2008, in which a judgment had not been rendered.

Including Sargent’s award, the class received a total of $31,500, of which $25,500 paid attorney's fees.

Lawyers filing the suit were Robert E. Stochel of Crown Point and Glenn S. Vician of Merrillville.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • class action
    maybe if these deadbeats had paid their bills the atty's would not be walking away with 25K out of the 31K settlement. i hope the hospital goes after the awards.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So as I read this the one question that continues to come to me to ask is. Didn't Indiana only have a couple of exchanges for people to opt into which were very high because we really didn't want to expect the plan. So was this study done during that time and if so then I can understand these numbers. I also understand that we have now opened up for more options for hoosiers to choose from. Please correct if I'm wrong and if I'm not why was this not part of the story so that true overview could be taken away and not just parts of it to continue this negative tone against the ACA. I look forward to the clarity.

  2. It's really very simple. All forms of transportation are subsidized. All of them. Your tax money already goes toward every single form of transportation in the state. It is not a bad thing to put tax money toward mass transit. The state spends over 1,000,000,000 (yes billion) on roadway expansions and maintenance every single year. If you want to cry foul over anything cry foul over the overbuilding of highways which only serve people who can afford their own automobile.

  3. So instead of subsidizing a project with a market-driven scope, you suggest we subsidize a project that is way out of line with anything that can be economically sustainable just so we can have a better-looking skyline?

  4. Downtowner, if Cummins isn't getting expedited permitting and tax breaks to "do what they do", then I'd be happy with letting the market decide. But that isn't the case, is it?

  5. Patty, this commuter line provides a way for workers (willing to work lower wages) to get from Marion county to Hamilton county. These people are running your restaurants, hotels, hospitals, and retail stores. I don't see a lot of residents of Carmel working these jobs.

ADVERTISEMENT