IBJNews

St. Vincent sports practice to fill vacant Clay Terrace big box

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Clay Terrace in Carmel will have a new tenant later this year to occupy the big box space originally filled by Circuit City.

But the newcomer isn't the sort of glitzy retailer the upscale outdoor mall is accustomed to attracting. It’s St. Vincent Sports Performance, which is opening a location to complement its original practice on the northwest side.

In the meantime, St. Vincent has closed its other sports performance location, on the east side, and is shutting its orthopedics practice on West Carmel Drive. It will combine those services at Clay Terrace.

St. Vincent will start with six employees, including two physicians, and hopes to have the 26,000 square feet of space occupied by early September, said Ralph Reiff, executive director of St. Vincent Sports Performance.

“Strategically, we made a decision that we wanted to have a more robust presence in Hamilton County,” he said.

Simon Property Group, one of the owners of the mall, mentioned the move in its marketing materials available at the annual convention of the International Council of Shopping Centers in Las Vegas.

The conference runs through Wednesday and attracts nearly 40,000 developers, brokers and retailers hoping to consummate as many deals as possible.

St. Vincent’s move to Clay Terrace received mostly positive reviews from local retail brokers, who say the sports practice will help draw traffic to the property.

“These lines are continuing to blur as retailers look for smaller spaces,” said Scot Courtney, president and director of retail services at the Indianapolis office of Lee & Associates. “It’s all about convenience for the consumer.”

Large retailers still need bricks-and-mortar space. But with the growing popularity of online shopping, the number of big-box store locations is shrinking. So landlords need to find alternate tenants to fill those big, empty storefronts—a void medical office users often fill, real estate experts say.

Clay Terrace opened in 2005. Circuit City—and the entire Circuit City chain—went out of business four years later, the victim of a weak economy and competition from such rivals as Best Buy and locally based HHGregg.

“Medical users are a great backfill for these vacant boxes, because there are fewer anchor tenants,” said Rebecca Wells, a broker at the local office of Jones Lang LaSalle.

Steve Delaney, a retail broker at Sitehawk Retail Real Estate, agreed but said the St. Vincent still might not be the best fit.

“It’s maybe not the ideal use,” he said, “but it’ll draw a lot of traffic.”
 
St. Vincent Sports Performance’s existing location is at 8227 Northwest Blvd. The offices is staffed by physicians, athletic trainers, physical therapists, strength-and-conditioning coaches, and sports dieticians.

The practice has built a solid reputation in the sports world through the years, providing services to amateur athletes and professionals, including NBA and NFL players.

Another benefit of the Clay Terrace location is that it is close to high schools in Zionsville, Carmel, Westfield and Sheridan. The practice provides certified athletic trainers to the schools on a contract basis, Reiff said.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • owned
    LbJ you got owned by the gentleman before me. Get ur facts
  • article information
    I just wanted to point out that the old Circuit City space at Clay Terrace has not been vacant since they went out of business. Snapperz has been in that location the past two years and another kid entertainment place was there before that for around 6 months to a year. Also Clay Terrace did not open in 2007 but in 2005. I think the St. Vincent sports practice will be a good fit.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT