IBJNews

State, city agencies get new round of federal arts funding

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Indiana and Indianapolis arts agencies will receive more than a half-million dollars in federal stimulus money to help save jobs at local organizations, the National Endowment for the Arts announced today.

The NEA said a second round of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funding includes $250,000 for the Arts Council of Indianapolis.

The NEA also announced today a $50,000 grant for the Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra.

Arts Council spokesman Mike Knight said his group plans to use $50,000 of the funds to help pay its own staff salaries and pool the remaining money with $323,000 granted to the Indiana Arts Commission.

The Indiana Arts Commission, a state agency, reviewed about 85 applications for emergency funding earlier this summer. The IAC will distribute grants of $15,000 to $20,000 specifically to preserve key paid positions, said Louis Ricci, executive director of the IAC.

“Without an artistic director or executive director, you don’t have professional arts organizations,” he said.

Depending on their size, arts organizations applied directly for federal funding to the National Endowment for the Arts or through the state agency. Altogether, about $650,000 in federal stimulus money will go to preserving arts jobs in Indiana, Ricci said.

The IAC has not yet released the list of grant recipients, but Ricci said about half the grants will be in Marion County.

The NEA announced stimulus funding for three other Indiana organizations: Elkhart Centre Inc., $50,000; South Shore Arts Inc., Munster, $50,000; Fischoff National Chamber Music Association, Notre Dame, $25,000.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT