IBJNews

State eyes possible takeover of 18 failing schools

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eighteen Indiana schools have a lot riding on statewide test scores that will be released this summer. If the schools fail again — marking a sixth consecutive year of being on academic probation — the state could turn them over to private companies charged with spurring improvement.

School leaders, teachers, parents and students are sticking up for their local schools at public hearings around the state, saying they want to retain control and that they know better than anyone what their districts need to succeed.

But State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said it's simply unacceptable to have six straight years of failing schools.

"The state isn't being aggressive enough," he told The Associated Press. "The fact that we have children in communities who spend their entire high school and junior high years in bad schools — that's not the fault of the kids or the parents, that's the fault of state leadership to say 'We should not tolerate this.'"

The 18 schools are located in urban areas, with seven in Indianapolis Public Schools. IPS spokeswoman Kim Hooper said the district hopes test scores released in June and July will show enough improvement at least two failing schools — Broad Ripple High School and George Washington Community High School — to pull them out of probation and keep the state at bay.

Parents and teachers at other schools are hoping for test score success. But the state is holding public hearings this summer in cities where the schools are located discussion options in case they fail. Meetings are being held in Fort Wayne, South Bend, East Chicago, Marion, Gary, Hammond and Indianapolis, and wrap up July 11.

If any of the 18 schools are still on academic probation once test scores are released, the state Board of Education likely will meet in August to choose one of five options, including merging with another school, implementing changes suggested at the public meetings or turning the school to a private company.

Skeptics say turning around urban schools is more difficult than outsiders think.

"If you've never worked in urban education, it's easy to have tough talk about children and failing schools and how we need to save them," Hooper said. "That's political talk. The reality is, in urban education we serve every child who comes in the front door. It's not an excuse, it's the reality."

That includes students who don't know English, students with parents who don't prioritize education, and poor students who are more concerned with their next meal than studying algebra.

Juli Van Wyk, who has three kids who graduated from IPS, said the wide range of students in the schools is a challenge. But she said the state seems to be overlooking progress being made at places like Broad Ripple High School, where her youngest child attended before moving on to Butler University this fall.

"If parents really think the school's failing the kids, they're going to move them to another school. You're not seeing droves of parents take their kids out," she said. "I'm just not sure that you can always judge a school as failing by looking at test scores."

In South Bend, officials say they are working hard to turn around the three schools on the list of 18. Jay Caponigro, a school board member, said community partners have stepped up and all parties are coming together to improve the schools and avoid state takeover.

"That's exciting to see that kind of energy percolating around us," he said. "The state pressure has helped us focus on the kids that were struggling most."

Bennett said the Board of Education will make its determination of possible takeover based on what's best for each individual school and the students there. But his preference is not necessarily for turning the schools over to private management companies.

"My hope is that the local school community, in concert with the local school corporation, comes together and takes the necessary steps to right the ship themselves," Bennett said.

Bennett, an outspoken Republican who has angered and alienated many teachers by pushing sweeping education changes in the Statehouse, is comfortable keeping the pressure on schools. He has met with leaders at the 18 schools and says he'll do what it takes to get results.

"I told them I either wanted to be their best friend or their worst enemy — whichever will help them the most."

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT