IBJNews

State Fair victims could receive funds in next few weeks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Donations to benefit victims of the Indiana State Fair stage collapse could begin to be distributed within the next two weeks, but determining a cause of the accident is likely to take several months.

A State Fair Remembrance Fund now containing more than $800,000 in donations likely will be distributed before the state begins to pay out a maximum $5 million in damages allowed by law, Kenneth Feinberg said Wednesday afternoon.

Feinberg, an expert who administered victim-compensation funds following 9/11 and the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, is serving as an unpaid consultant to the state on claims associated with the concert tragedy as well as offering advice on distribution of the remembrance fund.

Feinberg said the challenge will be determining who’s eligible to receive money from the two pools of funds.

“There’s a limited amount of money here,” Feinberg said. “How much will go to death claims and injury claims? We will have a final answer to those questions in a matter of weeks.”

Strong winds toppled a state fair stage onto fans waiting to see country act Sugarland perform at the Grandstand Aug. 13, leading to seven deaths and leaving dozens injured. Some of the injured may require care for the rest of their lives.

Feinberg also met with Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller for the first time on Wednesday to begin developing a protocol to distribute state settlement payments.

A date to begin allocating those funds has not been set, said Bryan Corbin, spokesman for the attorney general.

“The priority is going to be on payments to families of the fatality victims and to those most seriously inured,” he said. “That’s where the priority will be, because there’s a finite amount of money (available).”

Indiana law caps total damages to a state entity at $5 million with a $700,000 cap per individual claim.

At least 15 tort claims have been filed against the state on behalf of the victims. Several other lawsuits have been filed against several other parties besides the state fair in an effort to win larger judgments.
 
Meanwhile, Scott Nacheman of New York engineering firm Thornton Tomasetti Inc., said it would be six to eight months before they could determine a cause of the accident.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT