State giving $345K incentive to Turner for company project

Associated Press
May 20, 2014
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Economic Development Corp. is giving Mainstreet Property Group an economic development grant of $345,000 for the construction of a nursing home in Terre Haute that is expected to net House Speaker Pro Tem Eric Turner $1.8 million.

The financial incentive was originally offered by the state so that Mainstreet, which is owned in part by Turner and his son, could move its headquarters from Cicero to Carmel. But now the grant will go toward the construction of a $15.3 million project in Terre Haute, one of many Mainstreet projects Turner helped save when he defeated legislation that would have banned the construction of new nursing homes.

Gov. Mike Pence had placed a hold on the state aid last year after The Associated Press reported Turner's connection to the company. But an IEDC review found "no conflict of interest" and cleared the money for the Turners.

John Mutz, a former Republican lieutenant governor and head of the IEDC panel that initially cleared the money for the company's relocation, said he had concerns about a state lawmaker benefiting from state tax dollars, but also did not think that should stand in the way of a good project being completed.

"Of course there's a concern," Mutz said. "In my mind, as a committee member, I want to know if somebody has an interest in these things. But that doesn't necessarily mean their business shouldn't get the credit."

At the center of the issue is Turner's ownership stake in Mainstreet and legislation proposed earlier this year that would have halted Mainstreet's construction of new nursing homes. In public, Turner recused himself from votes on the issue, but in private meetings of House Republicans he successfully lobbied against the ban.

The House Ethics Committee determined last month that Eric Turner did not technically violate any ethics rules, but decided that ethics rules need to be tightened because of concerns exposed by the situation.

The $345,000 from the state will now go toward the construction of a nursing home at the western edge of Terre Haute.

The Terre Haute nursing home is expected have about 75 to 80 beds. The project should create 123 permanent jobs and 350 construction jobs, according to Mainstreet. Mainstreet purchased the 5.7-acre property for the home from the city of Terre Haute for $1 million last year.

According to Mainstreet Property documents obtained by the AP, the company expects to spend $15.3 million completing the project and then sell it to a Canadian company started by Zeke Turner, Eric Turner's son, for $20.1 million.

The sale will be enough to net Eric Turner $1.8 million, according to a Mainstreet investment document obtained by the AP, as he owns 50 percent of a company that owns 76 percent of Mainstreet, giving him a 38-percent share of Mainstreet.

"As a passive investor in Mainstreet, Eric has no responsibilities regarding the day-to-day management and operation of the business," Turner spokesman Roger Harvey said in a prepared statement.

Mainstreet spokeswoman Kate Snedeker has maintained that Eric Turner has no say in how the company operates, and also that the state aid is being provided to the city of Terre Haute and not Mainstreet. IEDC spokeswoman Katelyn Hancock also said the grant was not being provided to Mainstreet.

But the September 2013 contract signed by the IEDC and the city specifies that Mainstreet will ultimately receive the $345,000. The city will act as a pass-through, giving the money to Mainstreet once it has completed expensive site preparations, including filling in a basin and driving in pylons around the site.

Josh Perry, an assistant professor of business law and ethics at Indiana University, said actions like the state's approval of money for Turner and lobbying in secret meetings of the House Republican caucus "erode the public trust" in government.


  • Stunning Loss of Words
    I am truly at a loss for words! Yes, the public trust has eroded to almost nothing. Does anyone at the IEDC and in the Governor's office have a brain and a conscience?
  • Deeper Still...
    When is someone going to dig more into this company's Westfield project? Mayor Crook, err Cook, and the city sure made some things happen there that certainly benefit Rep. Turner. I wonder if Rep. Turner had anything to do with making sure the TIF funds would be available that helped get the Westfield project built?
  • I wonder....
    if Roger Harvey was laughing hysterically as he typed this...."As a passive investor in Mainstreet, Eric has no responsibilities regarding the day-to-day management and operation of the business," Turner spokesman Roger Harvey said in a prepared statement.
  • Tax avoidance
    I'll bet he does not pay full tax on the 1.8 million.
  • This Fails the Sniff Test
    Turner's business model, if you want to call it that, stinks. This isn't capitalism, this is cronyism.
  • how about eliminate public trust in government
    Looks like subterfuge, pass through, and the government is not to be trusted, government officials getting money indirectly and claiming they have no active role, I suggest the state of Indiana have him divest himself of his company if it is a conflict of interest. Wish I had these kind of connections as an ordinary citizen. Obviously money and power buys privelege.
  • this is how our society works
    As usual and on par, it is OK for them to do this in the eyes of the government. I don't get it, this $345,000 would go a long way to creating alot of small companies in Indiana, but a Nursing Home, give me a break, let them invest their own money and use the IEDC money for IT and Technology, small business startups. How exactly does this move Indiana forward in our ability to compete, it is a complete boondoggle for Terre Haute and for this politician, I guess what goes around comes around and goes right back into his investment. While there are entrepeneurs needing seed capital for 21st century industry, this appalling way of doing business occurs. Makes the IEDC look like a back way for politicians to fund their businesses.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.