IBJNews

State high court to hear Simon defamation suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A defamation lawsuit filed by Indiana Pacers owner Herb Simon and his wife against a Beverly Hills attorney has reached the Indiana Supreme Court.

The state’s high court has agreed to hear oral arguments Oct. 24 in the Simons’ dispute with lawyer Joseph A. Davis following a ruling at the appellate court level that went against the couple.

The lawsuit stems from comments Davis made to Indianapolis television station WTHR-TV Channel 13 regarding a lawsuit filed by a former nanny of the Simons, whom Davis represented.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge in September 2011 tossed the lawsuit filed by the nanny, who claimed the Simons fired her because she became pregnant.

Meanwhile, the Simons had sued in Marion County for defamation based on statements Davis made to WTHR that “the firing is because my client refused to engage in an unlawful, meaning a criminal, act pursuant to our immigration laws. This was all designed to conceal from local and state authorities the existence of this undocumented worker.”

Davis moved to dismiss the Simons’ suit for lack of jurisdiction because he resides in California, but Judge Heather Welch denied the motion in October 2010.

Davis appealed and, in a split decision in February this year, two appellate judges reversed and ruled in his favor.

“Regardless of whether Davis returned the WTHR reporter’s phone call or not, we conclude that this inquiry is immaterial because the record unequivocally demonstrates that it was WTHR who initiated the contact, and Davis did nothing more than simply respond to WTHR’s inquiry it initiated,” Judge Elaine Brown wrote.

Attorney David Herzog of the Indianapolis office of Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, who is representing Simon and his former beauty queen wife, Bui, declined to comment on the Supreme Court’s decision to hear their case.

Should the Supreme Court reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision, the case will return to Marion Superior Court. Judge Welch’s earlier denial of Davis’ motion to dismiss was based solely on jurisdiction and did not address the merits of the case.

Simon helped found Indianapolis-based Simon Property Group Inc. According to Forbes, his net worth is $1.6 billion. He and his wife have homes in Malibu and Santa Barbara in California, and in Indiana.
 
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT