IBJNews

State likely to grow in middle, population report says

Associated Press
March 28, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's population is projected to grow by 1 million people by 2050, to nearly 7.5 million people in total, but most of the growth will occur in the Indianapolis area, especially in the northern suburbs.

The Indiana Business Research Center at Indiana University says about one in every three Indiana residents will live in the Indianapolis area by 2050, up from 27 percent in 2010.

Matt Kinghorn, state demographer for the research center, told The Herald-Times that area will claim as much as two-thirds of the state's growth over the next 40 years.

Hamilton County will continue to be the state’s fastest-growing county, doubling in size to 548,000 residents by 2050, and passing Lake and Allen counties to become the state’s second-largest county behind Marion County, the report says.

Over the same period, Hendricks County’s population will rise to 268,000 residents—an 84 percent increase. Boone, Hancock and Johnson counties will round out the state’s five fastest-growing communities.

Aging baby boomers will increase seniors' share of the state population to 20 percent by 2050 compared to 13 percent in 2010. Kinghorn said that could significantly impact such areas such as appropriate housing, health care delivery and transportation needs.

Outside central Indiana, other fast-growing areas of the state will include Clark and Harrison counties in the Louisville metro area, which will grow by 35 percent and 22 percent, respectively, the center projects. Warrick County in the Evansville metro area, along with Porter County in northwest Indiana and Elkhart County in north central Indiana, each should grow by 25 percent.

Meanwhile, large swaths of mid-sized and rural communities in north, east and west-central Indiana are projected to lose population over the next 40 years. Many counties in southwest Indiana are also likely to lose people. Forty-nine of Indiana's 92 counties are forecast to lose population.

Baby boomers becoming seniors will add 600,000 people to the state's over-65 demographic, the center projects.

Kinghorn said that could mean Indiana will feel a significant impact in areas such as appropriate housing, health care delivery and transportation needs.

Other age groups will decline in their proportion of the state's population pie but their numbers still will grow. Both Indiana's child population (age 0 to 14) and its younger adult age group (25 to 44) will increase by 75,000 by 2030, and those around college age will increase by 25,000. Indiana's older working-age population (45 to 64) will decline by roughly 100,000 over the same period as baby boomers retire.

"One important effect of this graying of the population will be the slowing of Indiana's population growth rate in the coming decades," Kinghorn said. "While migration plays an important role in population change, natural increase typically accounts for the majority of Indiana's growth.

However, Indiana isn't aging as rapidly as some other Midwestern states and that could prove beneficial in certain sectors of the job market.

"Actually we're a comparatively young state," Kinghorn said. "In 2010 our median age was 37 while the nation was at 37.2. And we're about two years younger than neighbors Michigan and Ohio, which is rather significant."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I Concur
    I have to concur with the previous comments regarding the discriminatory laws and practices of this backwoods state. I will retire in 3 or 4 years and cannot wait to take my substantial retirement income and related taxes to somewhere that doesn't discriminate against its populus and actually cares about people...
  • I Think Not
    When Indiana legislators have worked so hard to enact discriminatory laws, limp-wristed smoking bans, and increased tax structures, I can't imagine why anyone would choose to move to this state. Likewise, I can't imagine why anyone chooses to remain in this backward-thinking, lackluster state.
    • wrong
      everytime they guess this stuff they are always wrong.
      For example the US census said Indiana had a population estimate of 6.3M in 2009 but in the 2010 census we had almost 6.5M people so i expect Indiana to pass 7M people by 2020 cause now we have Right to Work and were one of the best states for job creation. People move where the jobs are.
      Again these studies are a bunch of BS.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT