IBJNews

State likely to grow in middle, population report says

Associated Press
March 28, 2012
Keywords
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana's population is projected to grow by 1 million people by 2050, to nearly 7.5 million people in total, but most of the growth will occur in the Indianapolis area, especially in the northern suburbs.

The Indiana Business Research Center at Indiana University says about one in every three Indiana residents will live in the Indianapolis area by 2050, up from 27 percent in 2010.

Matt Kinghorn, state demographer for the research center, told The Herald-Times that area will claim as much as two-thirds of the state's growth over the next 40 years.

Hamilton County will continue to be the state’s fastest-growing county, doubling in size to 548,000 residents by 2050, and passing Lake and Allen counties to become the state’s second-largest county behind Marion County, the report says.

Over the same period, Hendricks County’s population will rise to 268,000 residents—an 84 percent increase. Boone, Hancock and Johnson counties will round out the state’s five fastest-growing communities.

Aging baby boomers will increase seniors' share of the state population to 20 percent by 2050 compared to 13 percent in 2010. Kinghorn said that could significantly impact such areas such as appropriate housing, health care delivery and transportation needs.

Outside central Indiana, other fast-growing areas of the state will include Clark and Harrison counties in the Louisville metro area, which will grow by 35 percent and 22 percent, respectively, the center projects. Warrick County in the Evansville metro area, along with Porter County in northwest Indiana and Elkhart County in north central Indiana, each should grow by 25 percent.

Meanwhile, large swaths of mid-sized and rural communities in north, east and west-central Indiana are projected to lose population over the next 40 years. Many counties in southwest Indiana are also likely to lose people. Forty-nine of Indiana's 92 counties are forecast to lose population.

Baby boomers becoming seniors will add 600,000 people to the state's over-65 demographic, the center projects.

Kinghorn said that could mean Indiana will feel a significant impact in areas such as appropriate housing, health care delivery and transportation needs.

Other age groups will decline in their proportion of the state's population pie but their numbers still will grow. Both Indiana's child population (age 0 to 14) and its younger adult age group (25 to 44) will increase by 75,000 by 2030, and those around college age will increase by 25,000. Indiana's older working-age population (45 to 64) will decline by roughly 100,000 over the same period as baby boomers retire.

"One important effect of this graying of the population will be the slowing of Indiana's population growth rate in the coming decades," Kinghorn said. "While migration plays an important role in population change, natural increase typically accounts for the majority of Indiana's growth.

However, Indiana isn't aging as rapidly as some other Midwestern states and that could prove beneficial in certain sectors of the job market.

"Actually we're a comparatively young state," Kinghorn said. "In 2010 our median age was 37 while the nation was at 37.2. And we're about two years younger than neighbors Michigan and Ohio, which is rather significant."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • I Concur
    I have to concur with the previous comments regarding the discriminatory laws and practices of this backwoods state. I will retire in 3 or 4 years and cannot wait to take my substantial retirement income and related taxes to somewhere that doesn't discriminate against its populus and actually cares about people...
  • I Think Not
    When Indiana legislators have worked so hard to enact discriminatory laws, limp-wristed smoking bans, and increased tax structures, I can't imagine why anyone would choose to move to this state. Likewise, I can't imagine why anyone chooses to remain in this backward-thinking, lackluster state.
    • wrong
      everytime they guess this stuff they are always wrong.
      For example the US census said Indiana had a population estimate of 6.3M in 2009 but in the 2010 census we had almost 6.5M people so i expect Indiana to pass 7M people by 2020 cause now we have Right to Work and were one of the best states for job creation. People move where the jobs are.
      Again these studies are a bunch of BS.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Aaron is my fav!

    2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

    3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

    4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

    5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    ADVERTISEMENT