IBJNews

State tries new plan to track students' growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana Department of Education will track each student's academic growth instead of focusing on standardized tests to measure their progress and that of their schools, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said Wednesday.

The Indiana Growth Model will help school districts to identify which teachers and teaching methods are most effective at improving all students' performances.

Bennett said many schools now concentrate on getting "bubble" students who are close to passing annual state tests over that hurdle, instead of spending more time and resources on those who score very low.

The state expects all students to grow, no matter where they start.

"Every student is entitled to one year of growth in one year of instruction," Bennett said at a news conference in his Statehouse office.

Under the new system each student's yearly academic growth will be calculated by comparing their progress to others who began at similar levels of achievement, he said.

The model will record each student's scores on the annual Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress-Plus tests and summarize the yearly progress of that student and their school and school corporation based on those results.

A low-achieving student with high growth could conceivably show better progress than a high-achieving student who grows little, Bennett said.

"This is a new way of keeping score," Bennett said, adding that it was something educators have sought for many years.

Department of Education spokeswoman Lauren Auld says the model will initially measure math and English progress because those are the two areas students are tested on yearly in grades 3-8 under ISTEP.

Frank Bush, executive director of the Indiana School Boards Association, said his group supports any measure that will help students and build skills. He called for a broader measurement tool that not only shows how a student fares in math and English but identifies deficiencies so educators can intervene early.

Nate Schellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association that represents nearly 50,000 education employees across the state, said a growth model was a good concept as long as it improved learning and was not used against teachers.

He said a student's progress should be measured using multiple tests and other factors such as teacher input, not a single standardized annual exam.

Under a state law, Indiana classifies schools in five categories based primarily on year-over-year passing marks on statewide ISTEP tests for grades 3 through 10. The categories are exemplary progress, commendable progress, academic progress, academic watch and academic probation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT