IBJNews

State tries new plan to track students' growth

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Department of Education will track each student's academic growth instead of focusing on standardized tests to measure their progress and that of their schools, Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Bennett said Wednesday.

The Indiana Growth Model will help school districts to identify which teachers and teaching methods are most effective at improving all students' performances.

Bennett said many schools now concentrate on getting "bubble" students who are close to passing annual state tests over that hurdle, instead of spending more time and resources on those who score very low.

The state expects all students to grow, no matter where they start.

"Every student is entitled to one year of growth in one year of instruction," Bennett said at a news conference in his Statehouse office.

Under the new system each student's yearly academic growth will be calculated by comparing their progress to others who began at similar levels of achievement, he said.

The model will record each student's scores on the annual Indiana Statewide Testing for Educational Progress-Plus tests and summarize the yearly progress of that student and their school and school corporation based on those results.

A low-achieving student with high growth could conceivably show better progress than a high-achieving student who grows little, Bennett said.

"This is a new way of keeping score," Bennett said, adding that it was something educators have sought for many years.

Department of Education spokeswoman Lauren Auld says the model will initially measure math and English progress because those are the two areas students are tested on yearly in grades 3-8 under ISTEP.

Frank Bush, executive director of the Indiana School Boards Association, said his group supports any measure that will help students and build skills. He called for a broader measurement tool that not only shows how a student fares in math and English but identifies deficiencies so educators can intervene early.

Nate Schellenberger, president of the Indiana State Teachers Association that represents nearly 50,000 education employees across the state, said a growth model was a good concept as long as it improved learning and was not used against teachers.

He said a student's progress should be measured using multiple tests and other factors such as teacher input, not a single standardized annual exam.

Under a state law, Indiana classifies schools in five categories based primarily on year-over-year passing marks on statewide ISTEP tests for grades 3 through 10. The categories are exemplary progress, commendable progress, academic progress, academic watch and academic probation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In reality, Lilly is maintaining profit by cutting costs such as Indiana/US citizen IT workers by a significant amount with their Tata Indian consulting connection, increasing Indian H1B's at Lillys Indiana locations significantly and offshoring to India high paying Indiana jobs to cut costs and increase profit at the expense of U.S. workers.

  2. I think perhaps there is legal precedence here in that the laws were intended for family farms, not pig processing plants on a huge scale. There has to be a way to squash this judges judgment and overrule her dumb judgement. Perhaps she should be required to live in one of those neighbors houses for a month next to the farm to see how she likes it. She is there to protect the people, not the corporations.

  3. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/engineer/facts/03-111.htm Corporate farms are not farms, they are indeed factories on a huge scale. The amount of waste and unhealthy smells are environmentally unsafe. If they want to do this, they should be forced to buy a boundary around their farm at a premium price to the homeowners and landowners that have to eat, sleep, and live in a cesspool of pig smells. Imagine living in a house that smells like a restroom all the time. Does the state really believe they should take the side of these corporate farms and not protect Indiana citizens. Perhaps justifiable they should force all the management of the farms to live on the farm itself and not live probably far away from there. Would be interesting to investigate the housing locations of those working at and managing the corporate farms.

  4. downtown in the same area as O'malia's. 350 E New York. Not sure that another one could survive. I agree a Target is needed d'town. Downtown Philly even had a 3 story Kmart for its downtown residents.

  5. Indy-area residents... most of you have no idea how AMAZING Aurelio's is. South of Chicago was a cool pizza place... but it pales in comparison to the heavenly thin crust Aurelio's pizza. Their deep dish is pretty good too. My waistline is expanding just thinking about this!

ADVERTISEMENT