IBJNews

Workplace fatalities fall to record low in Indiana

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indiana last year experienced its lowest number of workplace fatalities since the federal government began tracking the statistic in 1991, the state’s Department of Labor announced Thursday morning.

In 2010, 115 workers died on the job in Indiana, a decrease of eight from 2009, according to the department’s annual Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries report.

“While a record low is good statistically speaking, for 115 families, their tragic loss defies any statistic,” said Department of Labor Commissioner Lori Torres said in a prepared statement. “That is why there is no higher priority in our agency than safeguarding the lives of working Hoosiers through safety and health initiatives and enforcement programs.”

Industries with the highest fatality rates last year were agriculture (22), construction (18), transportation and warehousing (18), and manufacturing (13), the department said.

When combining all industries, transportation-related deaths continue to be the leading cause of work-related deaths in Indiana, the department said. In 2010, 54 deaths were transportation-related.

Contact with objects and equipment accounted for 19 deaths, followed by falls (17), assaults and violent acts (13), exposure to harmful substances (8) and fires and explosions (4).

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • LOL - first thing I thought of!
    Karen - right on !
  • There is a reason for that
    Unemployment at 9+% could have something to do with this. Have the number of deaths while at home gone up?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

    2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

    3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

    4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

    5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

    ADVERTISEMENT