IBJNews

Steak n Shake's annual profit sizzles

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Steak n Shake grew pretax profit in fiscal 2010 an impressive 331 percent, the owner of the Indianapolis-based restaurant chain said in a letter to shareholders over the weekend.

San Antonio-based Biglari Holdings Inc., which changed its name from Steak n Shake Co. in April, said the restaurant reported $37.7 million in pretax profit during the latest fiscal year, a huge increase from the $8.7 million it had in fiscal 2009.

Biglari Chairman Sardar Biglari said in the letter that Steak n Shake went from losing $100,000 a day at the beginning of last year to making $100,000 a day this year.

“Steak n Shake was a troubled company whose brand required repositioning, a task made even more enervating because it had to be undertaken in the midst of the ‘Great Recession,’” Biglari wrote. “After we removed the near-lethal cancer of bad strategy, the turnaround was quickly successful because of the fortitude, tenacity and commitment of all 20,000 associates who put their collective shoulders to the wheel executing the plan.”

Same-store sales increased 6.8 percent in the fiscal fourth quarter ended Sept. 30, marking the seventh consecutive quarter of growth.

Overall, Biglari Holdings in fiscal 2010 posted $28 million in profit on revenue of $622.9 million, largely due to Steak n Shake’s increase in same-store sales, Biglari said in its annual report filed on Monday.

Still, Biglari cautioned investors that the company expects “difficulties” in fiscal 2011 exceeding prior-year profits because of expected investments in human resources, training and franchising.

Steak n Shake operates 483 company-owned and franchised Steak n Shake restaurants.

Company shares rose to $433.11 each in late-morning trading, up 2.2 percent from their Monday opening price.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. First, the Athenaeum is going to have to get past the hurdle with the Lockerbie residents and the agreement that the parcel would be residential. Second, and in my opinion, this prime piece of property should include parking, PLUS, a black box theater(s), some market rate and affordable artist housing and a plan to renovate and reconfigure the second story theater. I would negotiate to add the DeHaan property surface parking lot into the development mix, place a one story surface parking garage on the DeHaan lot on the street level (for the Dehaan tenants use during the daytime) and add a second story to the garage that would become an addition to the current second story theater and then change the direction of the theater by moving the stage across the alley and on top of the DeHaan lot parking. You can add all the stage elements that are currently missing from the Athenaeum stage to make it more attractive for use by Ballet, Opera and traveling productions. Plus, the theater changes would probably help solve some of the soundproofing issues. Alas,it does not seem to be a part of the strategic plan to conduct a study to determine best use of the property. Seems like the current plan is a quick and easy move that ignores the property best use/potential and any strategic property planning for the effect on future generations.

  2. I recall that MSA's pilings are still in the ground and hard to remove. It’s not likely any proposal will include significant underground construction/parking because of this. Start adding 2 floors of retail, 8 floors of parking and 5-10 floors of possible hotel, and/or 10-20 floors of residential, and you are at 30 floors already with possible expansion of all the uses. But then again I could be wrong.

  3. Accoriding to their website there is no deadline to the Do Not Call list. What is this article referring to??

  4. On what planet are they entitled to this largesse from the stockholders? These people make multi-million dollar salaries: Pay for your own personal travel.

  5. It matters because they're already paid enormously fat salaries: Pay for your own personal travel. Being "taxed on it" isn't a valid excuse--so what? They're still being gifted a raft of luxury perks from somebody else's money on top of an enormous, lavish salary.

ADVERTISEMENT