Straub: Funding cut poses no threat to Super Bowl security

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indianapolis metropolitan area is among 33 nationwide that have been eliminated from a federal Homeland Security grant program for 2011.

Marion County and surrounding counties, mainly Hamilton, will lose out on $5 million to $7 million for equipment, training and personnel that had been anticipated for this year, Indianapolis Public Safety Director Frank Straub said.

That means police and fire chiefs will have to regroup and come up with a new plan for spending the $5 million they received in 2010, Straub said. Although Indianapolis has used past grant money to buy equipment and training for the 2012 Super Bowl, Straub said, "the security of the Super Bowl in no way, shape or form is going to be affected" by the loss of funding.

The Department of Homeland Security on Thursday announced that it would spend $2.1 billion for 12 different grant programs, $780 million less than last year. One of the major cuts was in the Urban Areas Security Initiative. 

About $540 million of that funding will go to 11 "tier-1" areas, while 20 second-tier areas will divide $121 million.

Straub, who was in Washington, D.C., for a meeting with Homeland Security officials last week, told the Wall Street Journal that he disagreed with the policy that knocked places like Indianapolis and Buffalo, N.Y., off the list. He cited Oklahoma City as an example of a small city subjected to terrorism.

At the same time, Straub said he's hopeful that Indianapolis will have access to new technology and equipment through a partnership with Homeland Security. He said he was invited to a meeting because federal officials were impressed with the Indianapolis model of placing police, fire and communications under one public-safety department. "We may become a test site for DHS," he said.

Straub declined to talk in detail about what equipment or programs Indianapolis and other departments had planned to cover with the Homeland Security grant. One major purchase in 2009 was a bomb-squad truck.

Some of the people whose jobs are covered by the grant monitor security cameras in the city. Straub said the city might cover positions for a short time from its own operating budget. For the most part, he said, Indianapolis has avoided adding personnel through the Homeland Security grants, which have been declining for the past several years.


  • Mayor Ballard Manufactures Greenbacks
    Frank just to talk to the Grand Wizard of Oz... Mayor Greg Ballard he can siphon off some $$$ from the water company deal... just have him borrow an extra 5-10 million and stick it to the water cmapny ratepayors... That's how it gets done.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Gay marriage is coming, whether or not these bigots and zealots like it or not. We must work to ensure future generations remember the likes of Greg Zoeller like they do the racists of our past...in shame.

  2. Perhaps a diagram of all the network connections of all politicians to their supporters and those who are elite/wealthy and how they have voted on bills that may have benefited their supporters. The truth may hurt, but there are no non-disclosures in government.

  3. I'm sure these lawyers were having problems coming up with any non-religious reason to ban same-sex marriage. I've asked proponents of this ban the question many times and the only answers I have received were religious reasons. Quite often the reason had to do with marriage to a pet or marriage between a group even though those have nothing at all to do with this. I'm looking forward to less discrimination in our state soon!

  4. They never let go of the "make babies" argument. It fails instantaneously because a considerable percentage of heterosexual marriages don't produce any children either. Although if someone wants to pass a law that any couple, heterosexual or homosexual, cannot be legally married (and therefore not utilize all legal, financial, and tax benefits that come with it) until they have produced a biological child, that would be fun to see as a spectator. "All this is a reflection of biology," Fisher answered. "Men and women make babies, same-sex couples do not... we have to have a mechanism to regulate that, and marriage is that mechanism." The civil contract called marriage does NOTHING to regulate babymaking, whether purposefully or accidental. These conservatives really need to understand that sex education and access to birth control do far more to regulate babymaking in this country. Moreover, last I checked, same-sex couples can make babies in a variety of ways, and none of them are by accident. Same-sex couples often foster and adopt the children produced by the many accidental pregnancies from mixed-sex couples who have failed at self-regulating their babymaking capabilities.

  5. Every parent I know with kids from 6 -12 has 98.3 on its car radio all the time!! Even when my daughter isn't in the car I sometimes forget to change stations. Not everybody wants to pay for satellite radio. This will be a huge disappointment to my 9 year old. And to me - there's so many songs on the radio that I don't want her listening to.