IBJNews

Strong Shoe Carnival profit beats estimates

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Strong sales of toning footwear helped Shoe Carnival Inc. post record earnings in its fiscal second quarter, the Evansville-based shoe and apparel retailer said Wednesday.

For the three months ended July 31, Shoe Carnival earned $4.1 million, or 32 cents per share, compared to $982,000, or 8 cents per share, in the same quarter last year.

The company's latest quarterly earnings included a gain of 4 cents per share from a favorable outcome on a state tax issue.

Analysts were expecting earnings of 27 cents per share for the second quarter.

Revenue increased 8.2 percent, to $165.4 million. Comparable store sales also jumped 8 percent.

Toning shoes, oddly shaped footwear with an unstable sole that throws off your balance—thereby helping you burn calories, improve posture and firm up the buttocks, thighs and calves—are flying off stores shelves nationwide, giving a boost to retailers like Shoe Carnival and Indianapolis-based The Finish Line Inc. As IBJ reported in its Aug. 23 issue, six of the 10 top-selling shoes in a recent survey fell in that category.

“While toning footwear was a key driver of our sales for the quarter, our non-athletic footwear, particularly sandals and other types of casual footwear for the family were also significant drivers of our sales increase,” Shoe Carnival President and CEO Mark Lemond said.

Shoe Carnival said it expects to earn 63 cents a share to 66 cents a share on revenue of $196 million to $202 million in the fiscal third quarter.

The chain of 313 stores in the Midwest, South and Southeast said it should open 10 new stores and close seven locations in the current fiscal year.

Company shares rose 57 cents on Wednesday, to close at $18.81 each. The stock has traded in a 52-week range of $12.79 to $29.26 per share.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. A non-compete clause is expected to keep Buchman from appearing on-air at WTHR for a year from the WISH contract’s expiration.

  2. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  3. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  4. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  5. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

ADVERTISEMENT