IBJNews

Struggling BlackBerry maker could be drag on BrightPoint

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

BrightPoint executives are watching Research in Motion Ltd.’s next move as closely as anyone in the wireless industry. That's because the Indianapolis-based company gets about 10 percent of its distribution business from the struggling BlackBerry maker.

Toronto-based RIM said Tuesday that it won’t turn a profit this quarter, and that it has hired investment bankers to explore strategic options, suggesting the company might be sold.

Last time a major wireless industry merger was announced—in March 2011, when AT&T said it wanted to buy T-Mobile—BrightPoint’s stock price dropped 21 percent over the following week. At the time, analysts predicted that AT&T, which was not a BrightPoint logistics customer, would cancel T-Mobile's contract with the company, but the merger deal died in December.

This time around, major consolidation in the industry could affect the distribution side of BrightPoint’s business, and the potential impact is less clear.

The company’s stock closed Wednesday at $4.89 per share, which is close to its 52-week low of $4.83. The stock has fallen 60 percent, from $11.99, since Feb. 1.

RIM’s troubles are one factor of many related to the company's stock performance, BrightPoint's director of investor relations, Tom Ward, said. BrightPoint has lowered its own earnings forecast this year, based on slower growth in the whole industry.

“Wireless overall seems to be out of favor with investors,” Ward said.

BrightPoint has shifted more of its business from logistics, where it deals with wireless service companies, to buying and reselling devices. BrightPoint’s two largest distribution customers are Nokia and Samsung, followed by RIM. Distribution accounted for $1.2 billion of BrightPoint's $1.37 billion in first-quarter revenue.

A RIM sale could mean simply that a larger share of BrightPoint’s business goes to the acquiring company, Ward said. “We may benefit in that way because we have relationships with all the players in the wireless industry.”

RIM could also end up licensing its technology to another manufacturer, or put off a sale in hopes of a successful launch of its BlackBerry 10 operating system, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

It’s unclear how those moves would affect BrightPoint.

“We’re doing everything we can to make sure we operate as efficiently as possible,” Ward said.

BrightPoint faced headwinds well before the latest revelations about RIM’s future.

The company revised its earnings per-share estimates downward in February after losing a customer, and its first-quarter earnings, reported in April, did not meet the Wall Street consensus.

Analysts often look to BrightPoint for a broad perspective on the industry, because the company handles logistics for a number of wireless operators. Ward said BrightPoint’s cautious outlook is turning out to be accurate.

Heading into the year, BrightPoint predicted the industry would be flat or up by about 5 percent, Ward noted, “and we were skewered for it.”

On May 23, equity analysts with Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. lowered their price targets on a number of wireless-industry stocks, including Brightpoint, based on flat growth expectations. Oppenheimer predicted BrightPoint would reach $9 per share, rather than $11, this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT