IBJNews

Struggling BlackBerry maker could be drag on BrightPoint

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

BrightPoint executives are watching Research in Motion Ltd.’s next move as closely as anyone in the wireless industry. That's because the Indianapolis-based company gets about 10 percent of its distribution business from the struggling BlackBerry maker.

Toronto-based RIM said Tuesday that it won’t turn a profit this quarter, and that it has hired investment bankers to explore strategic options, suggesting the company might be sold.

Last time a major wireless industry merger was announced—in March 2011, when AT&T said it wanted to buy T-Mobile—BrightPoint’s stock price dropped 21 percent over the following week. At the time, analysts predicted that AT&T, which was not a BrightPoint logistics customer, would cancel T-Mobile's contract with the company, but the merger deal died in December.

This time around, major consolidation in the industry could affect the distribution side of BrightPoint’s business, and the potential impact is less clear.

The company’s stock closed Wednesday at $4.89 per share, which is close to its 52-week low of $4.83. The stock has fallen 60 percent, from $11.99, since Feb. 1.

RIM’s troubles are one factor of many related to the company's stock performance, BrightPoint's director of investor relations, Tom Ward, said. BrightPoint has lowered its own earnings forecast this year, based on slower growth in the whole industry.

“Wireless overall seems to be out of favor with investors,” Ward said.

BrightPoint has shifted more of its business from logistics, where it deals with wireless service companies, to buying and reselling devices. BrightPoint’s two largest distribution customers are Nokia and Samsung, followed by RIM. Distribution accounted for $1.2 billion of BrightPoint's $1.37 billion in first-quarter revenue.

A RIM sale could mean simply that a larger share of BrightPoint’s business goes to the acquiring company, Ward said. “We may benefit in that way because we have relationships with all the players in the wireless industry.”

RIM could also end up licensing its technology to another manufacturer, or put off a sale in hopes of a successful launch of its BlackBerry 10 operating system, the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday.

It’s unclear how those moves would affect BrightPoint.

“We’re doing everything we can to make sure we operate as efficiently as possible,” Ward said.

BrightPoint faced headwinds well before the latest revelations about RIM’s future.

The company revised its earnings per-share estimates downward in February after losing a customer, and its first-quarter earnings, reported in April, did not meet the Wall Street consensus.

Analysts often look to BrightPoint for a broad perspective on the industry, because the company handles logistics for a number of wireless operators. Ward said BrightPoint’s cautious outlook is turning out to be accurate.

Heading into the year, BrightPoint predicted the industry would be flat or up by about 5 percent, Ward noted, “and we were skewered for it.”

On May 23, equity analysts with Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. lowered their price targets on a number of wireless-industry stocks, including Brightpoint, based on flat growth expectations. Oppenheimer predicted BrightPoint would reach $9 per share, rather than $11, this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  2. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

  3. If Whole Foods went in, I doubt the Nora one would stay open, and with all those customers coming to Broad Ripple traffic would be horrible, and forget about a run to the grocery on weekend nights. I think concern over the number of apartments is misplaced, but the 400 space parking garage has me concerned - someone needs to ask the developer just how much traffic they think this development is going to generate. I am not against more neighborhood residents, but heavy commercial traffic going in and out at that location sounds like a mess.

  4. I thought everyone was innocent until guilt was proven. Seems people have already convicted Reggie in the press. My nephew was a good kid and is a good man, more to this story im sure

  5. Going by the Marion County population only is of little use. 13th largest? No Way! To judge the real size of a metro area, the easy way is to look at the Arbitron rating list. Indianapolis hovers around 40th largest in the nation--sometimes more, sometimes less. Advertisers want to know exactly how large the population is before they buy radio advertising. Arbitron figured it out long ago. Indianapolis is estimated at 1,427,500. The real #13 is Seattle-Tacoma with a metro population of 3,470,400. So, the population of just Marion County is completely irrelevant to anything useful as far as metro area planning.

ADVERTISEMENT