IBJNews

Study finds $124M in visitor spending at fairgrounds

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indiana State Fairgrounds generated $124 million in visitor spending in 2011 and has an annual impact on the local economy similar to a factory employing 500 people, according to a study released Wednesday.

“There’s really nothing in Indiana that’s quite comparable to the state fairgrounds,” said study author Bruce Jaffee, Indiana University professor of business economics, in a prepared statement. “Its impact is different from something like the Super Bowl or a Final Four because it’s not a one-time occurrence.  It’s an economic engine generating spending, revenue and tax receipts year after year.”

In his study, Jaffee likened the fairgrounds to a manufacturing plant with 500 to 600 employees and per-employee revenue of $300,000 per year.

The latest study follows one in 2011 that found the Pepsi Coliseum at the fairgrounds generated $89.3 million in spending, with $73.3 million of that coming from out-of-town visitors. The 73-year-old coliseum accounts for 40 percent of the fairgrounds’ year-round operating revenue.

The Indiana State Fair Commission recently approved a plan to expand the coliseum’s seating from 8,000 to 9,000 by 2014. The renovation is slated to start this fall.

Now the commission is looking to draw attention to the fairgrounds for its year-round events.

“People know all about our wonderful fair, but hundreds of other year-round events draw millions of people to Indianapolis, and that results in an important economic boost to our area businesses and tax revenue,” Indiana State Fair Commission Chairman Andre Lacy said  in a prepared statement.

Jaffee took a conservative approach with the study by separating spending by visitor and local residents. The $124 million was spent by out-of-county visitors. Marion County residents spent another $34.4 million at the fairgrounds last year, he found. That money was likely to have been spent in Indianapolis anyway.

Jaffee did not calculate indirect spending by people who make money from the fairgrounds but said that could double the total impact.

The 17-day Indiana State Fair accounted for nearly 21 percent, or $26.2 million, of the fairgrounds-generated spending. That was up almost $7 million from 2001, the last time a study was conducted.

Fair attendees also generated more “balanced” spending, both inside and outside the fairgrounds, Jaffee noted. About three-quarters of the $124 million in visitor spending takes place inside the fairgrounds, the study said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Must be a lot of swap meets down there
    Nuff said...
  • Shrffling Dollars
    Here is my thinking. Tourism is just shuffling dollars around and not creating much value. Yes, we love the fair and for that the sports in Indianapolis. But, this is not the same as good manufacturing or production jobs. These reports are self serving and the multipliers are always at the high end of reality.
  • No Accountability
    They forgot to subtract the $11 million expense for killing and injuring some of their guests.

    And don't forget the countless additional millions being spent on lawyers and meaningless engineering/procedural studies trying to shift blame onto the victims and others.

    Coming up on one year anniversary with no changes in State Fair leadership.
  • Hope they didn't spend much for this study
    Wow, another inflated economic impact study telling us how important they are.

    Just waiting for them to start asking for money.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Steak and Shake USED to be a good place to eat, but the now empty parking spaces tell the story of Poor Service, Declining quality of food and just more gimmicks and rear cooking....I used to be a customer, but no more...won't be back...to many other Good Places to eat in INDY...

  2. This man has continued to destroy the Steak and Shake brand. Did he not learn from the sins of owners past. The SNS logo and Brand are strong, I cant understand why he wants to destroy the brand other than to satisfy his big ego.This will turn out to be a big mistake. Sleek new look for a traditional product..makes no logical sense

  3. I mean REALLY!!! What's next taking away the Burger King's crown, turn the golden arches into silver columns? No I know let's get Wendy a pink mohawk.

  4. A couple of thoughts on some of the information presented here from someone with a bit of experience in this area: First, Does anyone remember a time in the past 35 years when insurance premiums DIDN'T increase? They increase every year. The more rigorous rate review requirements of the Affordable Care Act (effective in 2011) have likely caused those increases to moderate as they have averaged below 10% for the past few years, down from much higer averages in prior years. Second, Oregon will operate a state-based Exchange. Recently, they were one of the first states to release their proposed (not yet reviewed by regulators)premium rates -- our first view of Exchange rates. After 2 insurers saw their competitors' rates, they pulled theirs back and re-submitted LOWER rates. In my nearly 10 years as a state insurance regulator, and two years as a federal regulator, I don't ever recall an insurer voluntarily lowering its rates. THAT'S the kind of transparency and competition the online marketplaces (Exchanges) will bring about. 3) ...and this is just a random thought: A big concern among health policy experts is the capacity of the primary care provider community to handle the happy fact that a large number of individuals will be newly-insured under the Affordable Care Act. With the system being stretched so thin for INSURED individuals, It seems highly doubtful that more than a very few "cash-and-carry" physicians will be able to survive in the new, improved healthcare system. Sally McCarty Center on Health Insurance Reform Georgetown University Health Policy Institute

  5. liek the rest of America

ADVERTISEMENT