IBJNews

Study: Newly insured to be poorer, less educated

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

New health insurance coverage created by the 2010 health reform law will attract a lower-income, less-educated and more diverse set of customers than the insurance markets that exist today, according to a new analysis by PricewaterhouseCoopers. And that could create challenges for doctors and hospitals trying to care for those patients.

The accounting firm’s Health Research Institute issued its predictions last week after analyzing government databases on the demographics of the insured and uninsured in America.

The law, called the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act, is expected to extend coverage to an additional 30 million Americans either through the state-federal Medicaid program or through subsidies to buy private health insurance in online marketplaces called exchanges.

In Indiana, state officials have yet to decide whether to expand the state’s Medicaid program to cover adults with incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty limit. State officials also have until Nov. 16 to notify the federal government whether they will start a state-run insurance exchange or instead let Hoosiers use a federally run exchange.

PricewaterhouseCoopers expects one-third of the newly insured to gain coverage through Medicaid, 45 percent to shop on the exchanges and the rest to enroll in employer-sponsored plans.

These new customers will have about half as much income as those who are currently insured. Pricewaterhouse predicts the average newly insured person will earn 166 percent of the federal poverty limit, compared with an average of 333 percent for those who have health insurance today.

Those differences even factor out the fact that far more of the newly insured will be single—52 percent—than is the case among those with health insurance today, where the rate of single patients is 29 percent.

A big reason for that income gap is that only 42 percent of the newly insured will have full-time jobs, versus 59 percent of insured patients today. Another 31 percent of the newly insured will either be unemployed or have only a part-time job, compared with just 17 percent of those who are insured today.

Another reason for the expected income gap: differences in education levels. Among the newly insured, just 22 percent will have an associate’s degree or higher, the analysis said, compared with 48 percent who have that much education among today’s insured population.

There will be slightly more minorities among the newly insured—25 percent, compared to 21 percent among today’s insured Americans. But the bigger diversity will be in language. Among the newly insured, Pricewaterhouse predicts, 24 percent will speak Spanish as their first language, compared to just 7 percent of those who are currently insured.

“The new patient population is more likely to have difficulty with English and be unaccustomed to deciphering the vagaries of the health system,” wrote the Pricewaterhouse researchers. “And although the new group reports feeling healthy, physicians suspect there will be a range of undetected medical issues to address.”

One physician interviewed by the Pricewaterhouse team said that the influx of new patients who have not received much medical care in recent years—while helpful for doctors and hospitals financially—likely will create a huge initial strain on the system.

“Even the initial health care assessment might be a problem for some of those patients and providers,” said Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. “Because they may not have seen a physician recently, they will require more hours of assessment and care.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT