IBJNews

Study of local mortgage defaults shows benefit of counseling

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Better borrower education before mortgage closings could have prevented some of the recession’s spike in defaults among low- and moderate-income homebuyers, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago concluded after studying marginal home loan recipients in Indianapolis for the last year.

Gene Amromin, a senior financial economist with the Fed, presented results of the study last week to the Indianapolis Neighborhood Housing Partnership Inc.'s board. INHP plans to release the results to the public this week.

“This wave of defaults reflects a vicious combination of a deep recession, a burst housing bubble and ill-advised financial choices by home borrowers,” the study reads. “These effects are particularly pronounced among the least creditworthy borrowers, many of whom became first-time homeowners in the heady days of the bubble. By one estimate, default rates on loans originated in 2006 by such ‘subprime’ borrowers approached a staggering 36 percent within 18 months of origination, as compared to 7.7 percent for the more traditional ‘prime’ borrowers.”

Founded in 1988, INHP is a not-for-profit that assists borrowers who have low incomes and checkered financial histories, teaching them key concepts of household budgeting, building their savings, repairing their credit records, and, ultimately, buying homes. Its rigorous program requires participants to graduate from a lengthy series of money-management classes and one-on-one monthly counseling sessions that continue for up to two years. INHP has an $8.8 million annual budget. Last year 1,715 households graduated from its education programs; 212 signed INHP loans.

With the help of Ohio State University and the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Chicago Fed analyzed 211 borrowers who had worked directly with INHP between 2005 and 2007, then compared their mortgage default rates against the 16,677 total low-income borrowers who got mortgage loans in Marion County during the same period. The results showed a clear correlation between credit counseling and decreased defaults.

INHP’s clients had average annual incomes of $27,000, compared to $54,000 for the rest of Marion County. Their average FICO scores were 614, well below the 691 average for the entire county. And the INHP group borrowed less—an average $69,900, compared to $108,000 for the whole county. All INHP clients took 30-year fixed rate mortgages, compared to only 81 percent countywide. The rest entered some other form of mortgage loan.

After one year, the Fed found just 3.8 percent of INHP clients had defaulted on their loans, compared to 6.3 percent among the larger population.

“The effects [of pre-loan credit counseling] are strongest among households that appear least creditworthy in terms of their income and FICO scores, but who are granted credit on the basis of non-public (soft) information gathered during the counseling relationship,” the study reads. It goes on to point out that fraud is much less likely among INHP’s client population, since borrowers must work closely with counselors for an extended period of time. INHP’s borrowers also may be more disciplined, conscientious and thrifty than the general borrower population, according to the study.

“There is little reason to believe INHP clients, on average, experienced a different set of external economic shocks than similar non-treated households,” the study concludes. “Thus, counseled borrowers appear to have developed a sustained ability to maintain superior loan performance.”

In presenting his findings to the INHP board, Amromin pointed out that long-term borrower relationships also help lenders learn about mortgage problems long before they reach crisis proportions, giving the parties time to avoid defaults. And when times are tough, borrowers are much more likely to seek help if they aren’t scared of the lender’s reaction.

“People who get in trouble are terrified of conflicts with their lender, so they don’t get in touch until it’s too late” Amromin told IBJ. “INHP knows exactly what happens to each low-income individual. They’re doing what any good portfolio lender should do.”

The Fed will use its study as it considers broad policy decisions on whether to encourage more pre-loan credit counseling across the country, or to crack down harder on lenders who steer marginal borrowers toward mortgages they can’t afford. Amromin said the Fed will likely end up doing both, but finding the right balance is tricky.

Joe Huntzinger, the not-for-profit’s vice president of mortgage lending, said INHP now will attempt to disseminate the study results.

“We are pleased with the results of the research, because they confirm that INHP’s methods are effective,” he said. “We are planning to share this information as much as possible to advocate for the importance of education and mortgage and credit counseling ahead of homeownership.”
 
Local bankers are already scrutinizing the study to improve their own lending practices. Mike Newbold, regional president for Columbus, Ohio-based Huntington National Bank, said he’s “amazed” with INHP’s results, noting that a large proportion of the people who go through its educational programs end up learning homeownership is something they can’t yet afford.

“Frankly, I wish every one of our borrowers, regardless whether they’re low-income or not, could go through a program like that,” Newbold said.

More credit counseling could have prevented some of the worst banking practices that helped spur the recession, Newbold said. His industry is still reeling from the actions of lenders who let subprime borrowers enter adjustable-rate home mortgages, with little or no thought about what happens after a year or two when the rates move up and taxes start to kick in.

“One of the things that caused the nosedive in the housing markets nationally is the fact there were borrowers that frankly didn’t know what they were doing, and some lenders willing to take advantage of that,” Newbold said. “That same borrower could have potentially been a very profitable borrower and very responsible, if they’d understood what they were getting into.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Besides...
    INHP is mainly grant funded and they will freely give you a copy of their annual report containing their budget if you ask. Furthermore, grant making organizations, both government and private, are asking for specific, definable results for the money they give. Government grants are the most difficult to get and keep because of the scrutiny and reporting process. People want to complain about the money given to not-for-profits, but if you want your communities, your cities, to have a low crime rate, high property values and an educated, employable populace, and you don't want the government to do it... you'd better start helping out the not-for-profit industry.
  • Actually...
    Actually, INHP does counsel home buyers who aren't clients but are in danger of losing their homes. INHP is part of the Indiana Foreclosure Prevention Network (IFPN) Get Hope Now, and has staff dedicated to responding to its hotline. INHP has worked with many, many families--nonclients--through IFPN's program.
  • What was left out
    INHP is exhibiting the same level of success that housing counseling agencies nationwide achieve when there's pre-purchase training; that's commendable. What the study left out was that with an $8 million budget, INHP doesn't help with counseling home buyers who haven't gone through their program (221 buyers) if they are in danger of losing their homes. It would be interesting to see how much it costs per client to provide these services; it appears that INHP could give the houses away --spending this much cash. There must be more to the story...

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Looking at the two companies - in spite of their relative size to one another -- Ricker's image is (by all accounts) pretty solid and reputable. Their locations are clean, employees are friendly and the products they offer are reasonably priced. By contrast, BP locations are all over the place and their reputation is poor, especially when you consider this is the same "company" whose disastrous oil spill and their response was nothing short of irresponsible should tell you a lot. The fact you also have people who are experienced in franchising saying their system/strategy is flawed is a good indication that another "spill" has occurred and it's the AM-PM/Ricker's customers/company that are having to deal with it.

    2. Daniel Lilly - Glad to hear about your points and miles. Enjoy Wisconsin and Illinois. You don't care one whit about financial discipline, which is why you will blast the "GOP". Classic liberalism.

    3. Isn't the real reason the terrain? The planners under-estimated the undulating terrain, sink holes, karst features, etc. This portion of the route was flawed from the beginning.

    4. You thought no Indy was bad, how's no fans working out for you? THe IRl No direct competition and still no fans. Hey George Family, spend another billion dollars, that will fix it.

    5. I live downtown Indy and had to be in downtown Chicago for a meeting. In other words, I am the target demographic for this train. It leaves at 6:00-- early but doable. Then I saw it takes 5+ hours. No way. I drove. I'm sure I paid 3 to 5 times as much once you factor in gas, parking, and tolls, but it was reimbursed so not a factor for me. Any business traveler is going to take the option that gets there quickly and reliably... and leisure travelers are going to take the option that has a good schedule and promotional prices (i.e., Megabus). Indy to Chicago is the right distance (too short to fly but takes several hours to drive) that this train could be extremely successful even without subsidies, if they could figure out how to have several frequencies (at least 3x/day) and make the trip in a reasonable amount of time. For those who have never lived on the east coast-- Amtrak is the #1 choice for NY-DC and NY-Boston. They have the Acela service, it runs almost every hour, and it takes you from downtown to downtown. It beats driving and flying hands down. It is too bad that we cannot build something like this in the midwest, at least to connect the bigger cities.

    ADVERTISEMENT