IBJNews

Study: Online doc ratings mostly positive

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angie’s List physician rating service has been controversial since it started in 2008. But an academic journal article is now telling the docs to relax. Nearly 90 percent of patient comments on sites like Angie’s List are positive.

The article, published in May in the Journal of General Internal Medicine, searched for ratings or reviews of 300 Boston physicians on 33 rating sites, including Angie’s List. The Indianapolis-based company offers health care reviews in all its 125 markets nationwide.

Roughly one in four of the Boston docs were mentioned on any of the sites. And only one in six had a patient write a narrative review of them.

Among those narrative reviews, 89 percent were positive and only 11 percent negative. A 2009 IBJ article also found that comments on physician rating sites were more positive than negative—in spite of fierce criticism of the sites by doctors.

“Despite controversy surrounding these sites, their use by patients has been limited to date, and a majority of reviews appear to be positive,” wrote lead author Dr. Tara Lagu, of the Baystate Medical Center in Springfield, Mass.

Some physicians appeared to be padding their ratings by writing reviews about themselves—or having their staff members write them. One review noted that a female physician was a “faculty member of the Reproductive Endocrinology Unit” and “an associate professor in medicine” at the local medical school. “She not only sees patients but also does research and edits a professional journal,” the review said, “so she is definitely up-to-date on all the latest developments in reproductive endocrinology. Highly recommend her.”

Angie Hicks, chief marketing officer at Angie’s List, said the journal article provides some validation to her company’s health care ratings.

“There’s still an element where consumers like to understand how other patients have reacted,” she said. She added that physicians have grown more comfortable with Angie’s List reviews the longer they’ve been out there.

“A lot of what physicians were against were sites that allow anonymous reporting,” she said. Angie’s List does not publicize reviewers’ names next to their comments, but does keep records of which of its subscribers made which comment—in case a physician challenges the veracity of a reviewer’s comment.

But the journal article also had some criticism for the quality of physician rating sites, saying the search tools are cumbersome, advertising is prevalent and information about physicians is incomplete.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT