IBJNews

Study to look at Camp Atterbury's economic impact

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana National Guard has asked for a study into the economic impact that the thousands of additional soldiers training at Camp Atterbury have had on the surrounding area.

The study will be led by an Indiana University professor and was sought because military leaders want information on the post's economic contribution in order to demonstrate its worth to elected officials, Atterbury spokeswoman Joanna Bryant Caplette told The Daily Journal of Franklin for a story Monday.

The post, about 40 miles south of Indianapolis, has trained more than 70,000 service members being deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan since it became a mobilization site in 2003, according to military officials. The Army is spending about $75 million on building additional barracks and other expansion projects at the base.

Barry Rubin, chairman of IU's policy analysis faculty, said the impact study could help Atterbury get training assignments now at other bases around the country that will be closed because of military budget cuts.

But Rubin said the study also will look at aspects such as soldiers who volunteer in the community, including for a conservation group and the children's museum in Columbus, Rubin said.

"We are particularly interested in the volunteerism that takes place by the military because no one has any idea about the quantity of it," he said. "But the contribution to the community goes beyond just dollars, and we want to be more comprehensive about the impact to the region."

The study is expected to be completed in May and will involve a class of about 30 graduate students.

Preliminary research found that soldiers from Camp Atterbury and the National Guard's Muscatatuck Center for Complex Operations in southern Indiana's Jennings County occupy an average of 20 rooms a night in seven hotels in Edinburgh, resulting in more than 50,000 annual room stays. Restaurant owners and managers told researchers that 30 to 75 percent of their sales can be directly attributed to one or both facilities.

Atterbury gets about $123 million in state and federal funding a year for operating costs, but that figure doesn't include salaries or benefits, Caplette said. Atterbury and Muscatatuck employ about 2,500 people, she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • GREENWOOD MISMANAGEMENT
    Got to agree with Nick, the impact to the Center Grove / Greenwood area is important. Especially after a decade of mismanagement by Greenwood Mayor Henderson the business climate in the area was decimated. This sort of government assistance is needed to keep the area from going into a further tailspin.
  • Center Grove benefiting
    As I am just starting college, I just got my first apartment a few months ago at Copper Chase in Center Grove. It is on Meridian and Stones Crossing. The brand-new complex is pretty large and very upscale. Probably about half of the residences are in the US Military and are stationed at Camp Atterbury. So it is not just Columbus and Edinburgh who is benefiting from the base!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT