IBJNews

Study to look at Camp Atterbury's economic impact

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana National Guard has asked for a study into the economic impact that the thousands of additional soldiers training at Camp Atterbury have had on the surrounding area.

The study will be led by an Indiana University professor and was sought because military leaders want information on the post's economic contribution in order to demonstrate its worth to elected officials, Atterbury spokeswoman Joanna Bryant Caplette told The Daily Journal of Franklin for a story Monday.

The post, about 40 miles south of Indianapolis, has trained more than 70,000 service members being deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan since it became a mobilization site in 2003, according to military officials. The Army is spending about $75 million on building additional barracks and other expansion projects at the base.

Barry Rubin, chairman of IU's policy analysis faculty, said the impact study could help Atterbury get training assignments now at other bases around the country that will be closed because of military budget cuts.

But Rubin said the study also will look at aspects such as soldiers who volunteer in the community, including for a conservation group and the children's museum in Columbus, Rubin said.

"We are particularly interested in the volunteerism that takes place by the military because no one has any idea about the quantity of it," he said. "But the contribution to the community goes beyond just dollars, and we want to be more comprehensive about the impact to the region."

The study is expected to be completed in May and will involve a class of about 30 graduate students.

Preliminary research found that soldiers from Camp Atterbury and the National Guard's Muscatatuck Center for Complex Operations in southern Indiana's Jennings County occupy an average of 20 rooms a night in seven hotels in Edinburgh, resulting in more than 50,000 annual room stays. Restaurant owners and managers told researchers that 30 to 75 percent of their sales can be directly attributed to one or both facilities.

Atterbury gets about $123 million in state and federal funding a year for operating costs, but that figure doesn't include salaries or benefits, Caplette said. Atterbury and Muscatatuck employ about 2,500 people, she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • GREENWOOD MISMANAGEMENT
    Got to agree with Nick, the impact to the Center Grove / Greenwood area is important. Especially after a decade of mismanagement by Greenwood Mayor Henderson the business climate in the area was decimated. This sort of government assistance is needed to keep the area from going into a further tailspin.
  • Center Grove benefiting
    As I am just starting college, I just got my first apartment a few months ago at Copper Chase in Center Grove. It is on Meridian and Stones Crossing. The brand-new complex is pretty large and very upscale. Probably about half of the residences are in the US Military and are stationed at Camp Atterbury. So it is not just Columbus and Edinburgh who is benefiting from the base!

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. With Pence running the ship good luck with a new government building on the site. He does everything on the cheap except unnecessary roads line a new beltway( like we need that). Things like state of the art office buildings and light rail will never be seen as an asset to these types. They don't get that these are the things that help a city prosper.

  2. Does the $100,000,000,000 include salaries for members of Congress?

  3. "But that doesn't change how the piece plays to most of the people who will see it." If it stands out so little during the day as you seem to suggest maybe most of the people who actually see it will be those present when it is dark enough to experience its full effects.

  4. That's the mentality of most retail marketers. In this case Leo was asked to build the brand. HHG then had a bad sales quarter and rather than stay the course, now want to go back to the schlock that Zimmerman provides (at a considerable cut in price.) And while HHG salesmen are, by far, the pushiest salesmen I have ever experienced, I believe they are NOT paid on commission. But that doesn't mean they aren't trained to be aggressive.

  5. The reason HHG's sales team hits you from the moment you walk through the door is the same reason car salesmen do the same thing: Commission. HHG's folks are paid by commission they and need to hit sales targets or get cut, while BB does not. The sales figures are aggressive, so turnover rate is high. Electronics are the largest commission earners along with non-needed warranties, service plans etc, known in the industry as 'cheese'. The wholesale base price is listed on the cryptic price tag in the string of numbers near the bar code. Know how to decipher it and you get things at cost, with little to no commission to the sales persons. Whether or not this is fair, is more of a moral question than a financial one.

ADVERTISEMENT