IBJOpinion

STYLE: Should we knock the knock-offs?

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Gabrielle Poshadlo

I recently stumbled across a local e-commerce company that’s something like the Forever 21 of handbags. Like that fast-fashion retailer with a reputation for copying runway looks, the Greenwood-based Handbag Heaven’s stock clearly isn’t designer merchandise, but it looks a lot like it. And for about $50 a pop, the copies are good enough to be tempting. I’ve been thinking about the “Sami” bag in particular, since it bears a striking resemblance to the “Stam satchel” by Marc Jacobs, a bag I’ve lusted after for more than a year.

In light of the copyright infringement lawsuits Coach has brought against two Indianapolis retailers, I find myself wondering if my Sami purchase is an ethical one, especially as someone who appreciates apparel (and accessories) as an art form.

On one hand, I love designer goods and I believe that nothing beats the quality of a $900 dress or a $700 pair of shoes. I don’t think the buyers of such merchandise are just lusting after labels: Those with the means are willing to pay for such things because the solid construction and attention to detail make them worth it. That’s why I jump at the chance to own said merchandise whenever possible, like when I snagged a Prada cocktail number from Thrifty Threads for $85.
 

Style Handbag Heaven’s Sami bag, above, is a close imitation of Marc Jacob’s Stam Satchel, which retails for about $1,450. (Photo Courtesy Handbag Heaven)

That said, I tend to care less about the name inside a garment than I do the appearance and quality of an item. Handbag X could be made by Joe Schmo’s grandma for all I care; if it’s beautiful, it’s beautiful.

It’s by this reasoning I came to purchase an overtly counterfeit Cartier briefcase while vacationing in Belize. It’s red leather, embossed with the company’s logo. The price tag alone was enough to know it’s a fake ($200 vs. more than $2,000 for the real thing), but it would be a sharp-looking bag even if I didn’t know what the interlocking “C’s” stand for.

OK, so I do sometimes picture children in impoverished nations working their little fingers to the bone for pennies each day so stylish-but-cash-strapped people like me can carry a purse that looks like something I’ll never be able to afford. Yes, that thought makes me feel guilty. But so does shopping at Wal-Mart and changing the channel when a Christian Children’s Fund commercial comes on. I can live with the seedy underbelly, I guess, because I think every industry has one.

Fashion professionals have been trying to suppress the Forever 21s of the world since 1941, when the Fashion Originators’ Guild began registering designs and refusing to sell to retailers who dealt in copies. The Federal Trade Commission, however, said that was a no-no.

Designers are justifiably worried their merchandise will be devalued by the knock-off items. If a potential customer can’t tell the difference between the $1,450 Stam satchel and the $54.95 Sami bag, why would anyone in their right mind shell out the big bucks?

I’ll tell you why. The Stam satchel will last the wearer 10 years or more if she (or he) decides to keep it that long, whereas the chintzy Sami will last a few seasons before disintegrating. In fact, the black tiered BCBG-imposter dress I bought from Forever 21 last year has already begun to fray.

Of course, we all have to deal with our financial realities. The Sami bag is my only option. But if I ever do have the good fortune to have my choice between premium merchandise and its shadow, you can bet I’ll be about $1,450 poorer.

For now? The Sami will do—even if it carries a little guilt in addition to my Prada wallet and Kate Spade sunglasses (both the real deal).•

__________

If you’d like to share your own style ideas or know anyone who’s making waves in the fashion community, contact Gabrielle Poshadlo at gposhadlo@ibj.com. This column appears monthly.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT