Subaru considers ways to fix its supply problem

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Subaru is having an existential crisis. Everything is going its way. Customers are clamoring for its cars, the yen is relatively weak, and its factories are whirring away as fast as they can.

In the U.S., where Subaru now sells about half of its vehicles, sales were up 27 percent in the first seven months of the year. Based on last month’s rate of sales, it could sell all the vehicles in its U.S. inventory in just 27 days—less than half the auto industry average.

Subaru,  which employs about 3,600 people in Lafayette, is taking measured steps to expand its production capacity, but today it is worried about running out of cars.

At the same time, it is facing a bigger question about what kind of company it wants to be. Subaru executives just aren’t sure how long the good times will last. Rising interest rates or another recession could cool the new-car market quickly. Plus, Subarus have always been kind of quirky, kind of niche. Investing a bunch of money to be something bigger or mainstream just doesn’t feel quite right.

“We know how to study worst-case scenarios, but we’ve never examined a best-case scenario,” Subaru of America Chairman Takeshi Tachimori told the Wall Street Journal recently.

Here’s the problem: It doesn’t make much financial sense to build a new car factory unless it can crank out at least 200,000 cars a year. For Subaru, that would represent almost one-third more vehicles than it made last year. It needs a middle ground, and fast. Here are two options:

If Subaru isn’t comfortable changing the supply side of its business, it could dial back demand a bit. Pushing prices up would improve its profit margins and build up a safer cushion on the inventory side. It might even burnish the brand a bit. It should be noted that Subaru has hardly tinkered with prices in its recent flurry of business. Its average monthly vehicle incentive—though still relatively small—actually increased slightly this year to $557, according to Bloomberg Industries data.

Toyota still owns 16.5 percent of Subaru’s parent company, Fuji Heavy Industries—an arrangement that isn’t talked about much anymore. Subaru’s Indiana plant even cranks out tens of thousands of Toyota Camrys every year in a contractual arrangement that dates to 2007. Although Subaru has already committed to spend $400 million to expand that factory, wiggling out of the Camry deal or at least pulling back some of that production capacity would be an easy way to make a few more Outbacks and Foresters.

Um, no, said Toyota spokesman Steven Curtis. “While Toyota has announced 10 manufacturing expansions in North America in the past 20 months, resulting in $2 billion in additional investments and more than 4,000 new jobs, we are not working with Subaru on any expansions.”

It might want to reconsider. In terms of production, Toyota is almost 12 times the size of Subaru; it stamped out 7.4 million cars last year, including 1.3 million in North America. Surely it can spare some slack in some of its assembly lines. Toyota’s U.S. sales were only up 17 percent from January through July and Camry sales only gained 16 percent in that time. Not bad, but Subaru is blowing those results away.


  • Subaru love
    I bought a 2014 Forester this spring. Had to give a list of colors I would and wouldn't accept and take what the dealer could locate for me. I love the way this car feels, drives and looks and I plan to drive it for a long time! More recently a family member bought a new Camry - and hates it because he finds it uncomfortable. Should have listened to me.
  • Good for Subaru
    and Lafayette. They have some neat looking cars and let's hope they keep selling. The last time I was in that plant, all that I could see were Camrys.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

    2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

    3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

    4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

    5. Oh wait. Never mind.