IBJNews

Suburban office market turns in strong first quarter

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The year is off to a good start in the suburban office market, where net absorption was the highest in five years, chipping away at what has been a chronically high vacancy rate.

In the downtown market, absorption was essentially flat, contributing to a slight increase in the vacancy rate.

The suburban multi-tenant office market saw net absorption of around 225,000 square feet. That’s the best number since the fourth quarter of 2006, when tenants soaked up 292,000 square feet, according to the Indianapolis office of CBRE. By CBRE’s count, the suburban vacancy rate fell a full point since the end of last year, from 21.2 percent to 20.2 percent.

Cassidy Turley’s first quarter report showed even stronger numbers: absorption for the quarter of 244,000 and vacancy falling from 21.4 percent at the end of last year to 19.9 percent. A year ago at this time, the numbers told a very different story. Vacancy was 22.5 percent, and instead of soaking up space ,overall occupancy fell by 37,000 square feet.

Several factors contributed to the good first quarter, brokers said.

“Tenants are becoming healthier financially and some are deciding to expand,” said David Moore, an office broker for Cassidy Turley.

He said that’s a switch from what had become all too common since 2008:  businesses failing and vacating their space. Moore said the numbers are also helped by the lack of any new construction in recent years.

Almost all of the suburban action is taking place on the north side in the Keystone submarket, where absorption was 104,000 square feet for the quarter, and in the North/Carmel submarket, where absorption was 89,000 square feet.

Among the largest recent deals was State Farm’s 90,000-square-foot lease at 9200 Keystone Crossing.   

If absorption remained at the same level over the next several quarters, champagne corks might be popping, but that won’t be the case, Moore said. “The market still has a ways to go.”

Landlords aren’t likely to regain the upper hand in rent negotiations any time soon, but some are in a better position than others. The owners of certain iconic properties, such as the Chase Tower downtown and certain Keystone at the Crossing office buildings, have a little more leverage with tenants, said Mary Beth Kohart, vice president of CBRE’s office services group.

Kohart said no single industry is leading the recovery in the suburban market. Insurance companies, tech firms and health care tenants are all playing a role, she said, noting that health care tenants are just as likely these days to rent space in the general office market than in the medical office market, which is tracked separately.
 
In the downtown submarket, vacancy ticked up to 17.7 percent in the first quarter compared with 17.6 percent at the end of last year, according to both CBRE and Cassidy Turley.

A handful of downtown tenants are shopping in the suburban market for space, said Moore, but he doesn’t see a trend of users moving away from downtown.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT