Supreme Court rejects Democrats' election-chief challenge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Indiana Supreme Court delivered a victory to Republicans on Thursday, ruling that Democrats waited too long to challenge the 2010 candidacy of the state's former elections chief. The decision cleared the way for Gov. Mitch Daniels to choose a replacement.

In a unanimous decision, the court overturned a Marion County judge's decision ordering the state recount commission to certify the runner-up, Democrat Vop Osili, as Indiana's secretary of state. Republican Charlie White, who won the race, was removed from office after he was convicted of felony voter fraud and perjury charges last month.

The ruling clears the way for Daniels to appoint White's replacement to the politically powerful office. Daniels, in a statement, said he would act promptly to fill the post. He named White's chief deputy, Jerry Bonnet, interim secretary of state after White's February conviction.

"The Supreme Court's resolution of this case brings finality to a difficult matter with many troublesome aspects. This ends a sad, sad chapter and I look forward to working with the new officeholder in restoring the public's confidence in the Office of Secretary of State," Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said in a statement. Zoeller's office represented the recount commission in the case.

White was convicted of listing his ex-wife's address instead of his own when he registered to vote in the May 2010 primary. Democrats said he did this because he didn't want to give up his Fishers Town Council salary, which he would have had to do because he had moved out of the district he was elected to represent. White was sentenced Feb. 23 to one year of home detention.

In a separate challenge before the recount commission and later a civil court, Democrats argued that White's candidacy was invalid because he was improperly registered to vote. They said his recent conviction on six felony charges proved their point.

But the justices said White was properly registered by the time the challenge was filed after the election, and that the two cases had nothing to do with each other. The issue of White's voter registration address was raised before the election by a private citizen, and there was no reason the Democrats couldn't also have raised the issue before voters went to the polls, Chief Justice Randall T. Shepard wrote in the 14-page opinion.

"Our conclusion is that the Code places a burden on political campaigns to investigate and vet their opposition before the pre-election time limitations expire, but that is better than the alternative: that a challenger might ignore a known (or knowable) disqualification challenge before the election, wait to see who won at the polls, and then seek to set aside the results of the democratic process." Shepard wrote.

The court said voters likely were aware of the concerns over White's voter registration at the time of the election, and it would not set aside their will. White won by about 300,000 votes.

"This court has always been wary of overturning the will of the voters who have freely and willingly cast their ballots," the ruling said. Three of the justices were appointed by Republican governors, and two by Democrats.

State Chairman Dan Parker said Democrats were disappointed by the ruling and still believed White's candidacy was illegitimate.

"It's unfortunate that instead of having someone in that office who stood before Indiana voters for an election, Hoosiers are going to have a Secretary of State appointed by Gov. Mitch Daniels," Parker said in a statement.

"We hope that person respects the integrity of the office and the elections process and will work with both parties to make sure that every Hoosier with the ability to vote can do so in a fair and open manner," he added.

Osili told The Associated Press that he hoped that whoever was appointed secretary of state would work with officials to make it easier for voters to comply with Indiana's voter ID law.

"The most important thing is that whoever is appointed to fill that slot has his or her highest priority to make sure that anyone who is legally able to vote in Indiana is able to vote," Osili said. "Nothing should be easier than being able to vote."

Indiana Republican Party State Chairman Eric Holcomb expressed relief in a statement and praised the court's decision.

"I commend the Indiana Supreme Court for its well thought out and considered decision in this matter. It is a far cry from the judicial activism used to try and overturn an election at the behest of Chairman Dan Parker and the Indiana Democratic Party," Holcomb said.


  • To stupid for words?
    The pancake reference leads me to wonder whether the writer is referring to the story of "Little Black Sambo". Is this a Moron's expression of joy that we don't have a Black Secretary of State as a result of the Supreme Court's decision? I hope not.
  • White
    Well, I guess someone just got "vopped". Hope he doesn't let them crocodile tears hit his pancakes!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. A Tilted Kilt at a water park themed hotel? Who planned that one? I guess the Dad's need something to do while the kids are on the water slides.

    2. Don't come down on the fair for offering drinks. This is a craft and certainly one that belongs in agriculture due to ingredients. And for those worrying about how much you can drink. I'm sure it's more to do with liability than anything else. They don't want people suing for being over served. If you want a buzz, do a little pre-drinking before you go.

    3. I don't drink but go into this "controlled area" so my friend can drink. They have their 3 drink limit and then I give my friend my 3 drink limit. How is the fair going to control this very likely situation????

    4. I feel the conditions of the alcohol sales are a bit heavy handed, but you need to realize this is the first year in quite some time that beer & wine will be sold at the fair. They're starting off slowly to get a gauge on how it will perform this year - I would assume if everything goes fine that they relax some of the limits in the next year or couple of years. That said, I think requiring the consumption of alcohol to only occur in the beer tent is a bit much. That is going to be an awkward situation for those with minors - "Honey, I'm getting a beer... Ok, sure go ahead... Alright see you in just a min- half an hour."

    5. This might be an effort on the part of the State Fair Board to manage the risk until they get a better feel for it. However, the blanket notion that alcohol should not be served at "family oriented" events is perhaps an oversimplification. and not too realistic. For 15 years, I was a volunteer at the Indianapolis Air Show, which was as family oriented an event as it gets. We sold beer donated by Monarch Beverage Company and served by licensed and trained employees of United Package Liquors who were unpaid volunteers. And where did that money go? To central Indiana children's charities, including Riley Hospital for Children! It's all about managing the risk.