IBJNews

Tennis officials confirm sale of tournament

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Officials with the Indianapolis Tennis Championships on Monday morning confirmed that they are selling the rights to host an annual men's professional tennis event that has roots in Indianapolis dating back to 1920.

ITC Director Kevin Martin said he has “explored every conceivable scenario” to keep the ATP Tour event, which is now held at the Indianapolis Tennis Center on the IUPUI campus.

ITC officials put out a press release this morning in response to an article about the event's move in this week’s Indianapolis Business Journal.

The event lost its title sponsor, RCA, following the 2006 tournament and subsequently lost its television deal with NBC. Attendance declined from near 100,000 in its heyday 15 to 20 years ago to just more than 41,000 in 2009.

U.S. Tennis Association officials told IBJ that the USTA’s Southern Section had bought the sanction for the tournament and planned to move the week-long event to the Atlanta Athletic Club in 2010, but Martin said no deal has been finalized.

“We are still in discussions with several different groups,” Martin said.

A Georgia-based marketing firm, The Forward Agency, last week began advertising sponsorships for the tournament in Atlanta.

“I don’t know where they got their information,” Martin said.

Those Internet ads have since been pulled.

Officials with the USTA’s Midwest Section in Indianapolis said they looked into buying the rights for the event, but decided they couldn’t afford to take an equity stake.

Martin declined to say how many groups ITC officials are negotiating with nor would he name the groups. He conceded that the event is in all likelihood heading out of Indianapolis.

The ATP has final approval over the sale of the tournament’s sanction.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Sometimes majority rule is a good thing, such as in the decision of whether or not to unionize. From the comments I read on this topic, I get the impression that people think that a union forces itself into a workplace against the will of the workers. A union is only established if supported by a majority of the workplace's workers. And if a majority of the workers disapprove of the union, they can also vote to have it removed. But you can't expect to run a union where services are provided to all, but dues are voluntary just the same as you couldn't run a government that way. What would happen if payment of taxes were optional? Most people wouldn't pay, it's human nature, and government would collapse. If a union isn't serving its workers well, the membership can vote in new leadership. Right-to-work is simply a strategy to decimate unions and decrease the wage structure for workers to increase profits for corporations. Unfortunately, the strategy has been successful at gaining allies among workers by turning them against one another and by appealing to patriotic terms such as "freedom", "liberty" and "rights". America will not be a better place for the majority of citizens if and when the unions have been eradicated by the rich.

  2. I moved to Indy 15 years ago and have been a dedicated WIBC listener every day on my drive to and from work. Loved Steve Simpson. Can't stand Tony Katz. The WIBC brass and Programming Director are idiots. I now listen to other stations.

  3. From the story: “I don’t know that you’re seeing this type of cumulative sports success anywhere else in the country right now,” said Milt Thompson, an Indianapolis sports attorney and marketer, who serves on the board of the Indianapolis Indians and the Capital Improvement Board, which manages the city’s sports venues. ----- Do we really want the fox guarding the henhouse? We shouldn't be surprised if the Indians get a deal in a few years like the Pacers have.

  4. Didn't we just go through the same with hospital over-construction? Suddenly Indiana had some of the highest hospital rates. Not surprisingly the over-construction led to over-saturation and the inevitable cost cutting measures by hospitals.

  5. The value of any company is what a buyer will pay for it. As such, values are subjective. If you had 10 consultants they would give you 10 different values. It has to be impossible to prove unless government has specific e-mails indicating they purposely inflated the value. Surely, the government will extort the $10 to $15 M it is going to cost to defend then go away. What a crock!

ADVERTISEMENT