IBJNews

To attack costs, Lilly accelerates R&D

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

With President Barack Obama looking to squeeze a bit more revenue out of the pharmaceutical industry, the stakes just keep getting higher for Eli Lilly and Co.’s efforts to develop drugs faster and cheaper.

Lilly is already trying to shave a year or more off the time it takes the company’s scientists to turn a drug discovery into an experimental drug tested in humans.

The company wants that process to average just 1,000 days—which is two years, nine months. Currently, it takes Lilly one or two years longer than that, said Andy Dahlem, vice president of the company’s research and development arm, Lilly Research Laboratories.

The industry average is 4.5 years, according to PhRMA, a trade group of drugmakers, including Lilly. It takes another decade for a drug to pass through clinical trials and hit the market.

“The drug development cycle time is taking longer. From a patient perspective, that is unacceptable,” Dahlem said at a briefing with reporters on Feb. 26. Dahlem wants to meet the 1,000-day goal by 2015.

Lilly is in a hurry about everything these days. That's because it faces the loss of more than half its sales in the next five years due to patent expirations on five of its best-selling drugs. The company can no longer afford to spend as much time (and therefore money) figuring out if a drug is ready for human trials.

Lilly also discussed Friday how its partnership with New Jersey-based Covance Inc. is helping it speed drug development. Covance acquired Lilly’s Greenfield Laboratories, along with 264 employees, in fall 2008. Lilly signed a 10-year contract with Covance for drug-development services.

The collaboration has yielded “tens of millions” of dollars in savings so far, the companies announced, and has saved time. As one example, Lilly and Covance officials said Covance can report toxicology results in 56 days, compared to the 89 days under Lilly's watch.

Just 10 more innovations like that, and Lilly will have saved a year in time. That’s important, because the company is trying to reduce its overall costs for bringing a new drug to market to $800 million. The company spends about $1 billion per new drug now.

Obama’s reforms, if enacted, could complicate things for Lilly. The company and its industry peers support Obama’s efforts to extend insurance coverage to 30 million more Americans (making more of them capable of buying expensive drugs) and reduce the amount Medicare recipients pay out of pocket for prescription drugs.

But Obama’s latest plan, issued Feb. 22, would assess $3.3 billion a year in fees on drugmakers and would insist on $90 million in price cuts for Medicare beneficiaries. Both totals are larger than the industry agreed to.

Lilly has more exposure than most of its peers to Medicare and Medicaid, the government-run health insurance programs. Its best-selling drug, the antipsychotic Zyprexa, is taken by many nursing home patients, most of whom pay their bills with Medicare or Medicaid.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I am a Lyft driver who is a licensed CDL professional driver. ALL Lyft drivers take pride in providing quality service to the Indianapolis and surrounding areas, and we take the safety of our passengers and the public seriously.(passengers are required to put seat belts on when they get in our cars) We do go through background checks, driving records are checked as are the personal cars we drive, (these are OUR private cars we use) Unlike taxi cabs and their drivers Lyft (and yes Uber) provide passengers with a clean car inside and out, a friendly and courteous driver, and who is dressed appropriately and is groomed appropriately. I go so far as to offer mints, candy and/or small bottle of water to the my customers. It's a mutual respect between driver and passenger. With Best Regards

  2. to be the big fish in the little pond of IRL midwest racin' when yer up against Racin' Gardner

  3. In the first sentance "As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss are build quality & price." need a way to edit

  4. As a resident of one of these new Carmel Apartments the issue the local governments need to discuss is build quality & price. First none of these places is worth $1100 for a one bedroom. Downtown Carmel or Keystone at the Crossing in Indy. It doesn't matter. All require you to get in your car to get just about anywhere you need to go. I'm in one of the Carmel apartments now where after just 2.5 short years one of the kitchen cabinet doors is crooked and lawn and property maintenance seems to be lacking my old Indianapolis apartment which cost $300 less. This is one of the new star apartments. As they keep building throughout the area "deals" will start popping up creating shoppers. If your property is falling apart after year 3 what will it look like after year 5 or 10??? Why would one stay here if they could move to a new Broad Ripple in 2 to 3 years or another part of the Far Northside?? The complexes aren't going to let the "poor" move in without local permission so that's not that problem, but it the occupancy rate drops suddenly because the "Young" people moved back to Indy then look out.

  5. Why are you so concerned about Ace hardware? I don't understand why anyone goes there! Every time ive gone in the past, they don't have what I need and I end up going to the big box stores. I understand the service aspect and that they try to be helpful but if they are going to survive I think they might need to carry more specialty parts.

ADVERTISEMENT