IBJNews

Tour manager may be key to stage collapse lawsuits

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The tour manager who was widely credited with saving the lives of country duo Sugarland before a deadly stage collapse at last summer's Indiana State Fair has become a central focus of lawyers seeking millions in damages for the families of seven people who died and dozens who were injured.

Fair officials say they had a concert promoter ask the band twice to delay the Aug. 13 concert because of concerns about severe weather, but were rebuffed. Investigative reports unveiled last week said tour manager Hellen Rollens told a state fair representative, "It's only rain. We can play."

About 55 minutes of last week's videotaped deposition from Sugarland lead singer Jennifer Nettles in Charleston, W. Va., was released Monday by Merrillville attorney Kenneth J. Allen, who represents victims of the stage collapse. In it, Nettles said that she wasn't aware what fans were told about the timing of the concert.

"I don't know if anybody was told anything," she said.

Asked if she felt responsible for the safety of the fans given the heavy equipment on stage, she said, "I don't feel it's my responsibility or my management's responsibility to evacuate the fans in case of danger. Do I care about their safety? Absolutely."

Nettles appeared taken aback when she was asked by Allen whether she blamed her fans for waiting.

"No. Of course not," she said.

Sugarland spokesman Allan Mayer said Monday that Nettles and Bush say they were never asked to delay the show.

Allen said Monday that a representative with the band was asked three times to delay the show.

Reports released last week after months of investigation faulted the fair for the lack of clear safety protocols and confusion over who was in charge. Reports also said the stage design was grossly inadequate.

Victims and survivors' families who are seeking millions of dollars in damages have filed lawsuits against various entities involved in the show. Determining who was responsible for the decision not to delay the concert could be a key factor in the outcome of those lawsuits.

The fair's executive director, Cindy Hoye, said in a deposition in February that she asked Eric Milby, a representative for a concert promotion company, to seek a delay. According to a report released last week by Witt Associates, which was hired by the state to examine the decisions made on Aug. 13, Milby and tour manager Rollens discussed putting off the show, but Rollens said the band wanted to go on and was willing to play in the rain.

But at show time, Rollens held the band backstage for a prayer circle, Sugarland manager Gail Gellman told The Associated Press in August. A minute later, the stage rigging collapsed as Rollens walked down the ramp, Gellman said.

"Her decision to hold them for literally a minute saved every band member and crew's life," Gellman said. She did not return phone calls from the AP seeking comment Monday.

Nettles said in the deposition that she didn't know whether anyone with the fair had the authority to cancel the show, but she said Rollens had the authority to cancel any Sugarland show. Nettles said she was told by Rollens about 90 minutes before the scheduled start of the concert that weather was coming but said she wasn't specifically told it was a severe thunderstorm. She said she relies on Rollens and others to alert her about weather.

Attorney Mario Massillamany, who is representing one of the injured audience members, said he would like to ask Rollens if fair officials had asked to delay the concert and if she had relayed that information to the band.

"The biggest thing is we got those reports, which have a timeline of what people said, and it appears that it's different than what Kristian and Jennifer are saying in their depositions," Massillamany said.

"I think the plot will thicken on the part of Hellen Rollens, but I think at the end of the day, she's an employee," said Allen, noting Rollens has not yet been deposed. "The band had the ultimate authority to say we're not performing, and Kristian Bush admitted as much."

Rollens' attorney, Kevin Kearney, did not return a phone call seeking comment. The AP was unable to locate a phone listing for Rollens in the Los Angeles area.

Allen said he released a portion of the deposition Monday because he believes Sugarland's publicists have been releasing inaccurate press releases.

Mayer, Sugarland's spokesman, said Rollens was still employed, but not acting as manager on the current tour. Mayer denied that the band was responsible.

"The decision to delay the show is typically left up to the venue," so in this case, the fair, he said.

The state's liability is limited to $5 million by state law, but state lawmakers voted in March to give an additional $6 million to the stage collapse victims.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Use the Cliche'
    First, I think bill is right on, some people were taking shelter already, thus taking responsibility for their own safety, without having to be told to, while others wouldn't move even if they were told.
    Second, now that the attornies are involved, they really don't want the responsibility to delay/postpone the show to be with the Fair Board whose liability is capped and the funds have already been fully payed out. All the maneuvering now is to try to make somebody (ie the band or management company) with deep pockets responsible in order to get a payday.
  • What would a delay do?
    Everyone is focused on if the band ignored the request for a delay. My question, regardless of if they are or are not responsible for this..... what would that have done? The announcer would come out, maybe, and say, "we are on a possible rain delay for 20 minutes". Everyone would still be there, listening to music through the speakers, not wanting to loose their standing spot. It would not have mattered one bit.
    • Tragic Event
      Would this same series of events ever occur at Verizon Wireless?! No. How can the Fair not know if they had the authority to cancel the show? Who would best know about Indiana weather and any safe evacuation plans to Fair or the band? The State Fair bungled this one on the day of the event and they are doing it again here. It's time the Fair officials step up and accept responsibility. It's the right thing to do. Very tragic all around. Bless the victims.
    • Who's in Charge?
      What difference does it make that the band wanted to play? The call to postpone sits solely in the hands of the Fair Board.
    • Tour Manager or Scapegoat
      If video and print in the media are to be taken at "face value"....the phrase "thrown under the bus" comes to mind!!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT