IBJNews

Troubled homebuilder's funds frozen after failing to pay judgment

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

An order by a Marion County judge to freeze certain Hansen & Horn Group Inc. funds sheds light on the severity of the Indianapolis homebuilder’s legal and financial woes.

The company is facing at least a dozen lawsuits filed this year, mostly by suppliers seeking to recover money they say Hansen & Horn owes them. One would-be homeowner also has filed suit, alleging the company misused construction funds. All told, the suits seek to recover more than $920,000.

Superior Court Judge Timothy Oakes on Thursday took the drastic step of having Monroe Bank place a 90-day hold on a Hansen & Horn account after it failed to pay a $183,000 judgment in a suit brought by a supplier in June.

Indianapolis-based Lee Supply Corp. sued the homebuilder after it failed to pay for materials and services, according to court documents. Hansen & Horn, meanwhile, attempted to have the lawsuit dismissed, a legal maneuver that Oakes rejected Nov. 3.

Hansen & Horn’s subsequent lack of payment prompted his order to have the bank freeze the homebuilder’s accounts. In addition, the judge ordered executives of Hansen & Horn to appear in court Jan. 26.

Steve Horn, the company’s chief operating officer, did not return phone calls seeking comment. Hansen & Horn’s law firm, Harrison & Moberly LLP, said its policy is to not comment on pending litigation.

Local bankruptcy attorney Jeffrey A. Hokanson of Hostetler & Kowalik PC said Hansen & Horn still can access the account, but only if it contains more than the judgment amount.

Still, freezing the funds of an established company such as Hansen & Horn is unusual, Hokanson said, because they tend to resolve disputes before getting to such a critical stage.

“Usually, larger establishments tend to work out their problems rather than have their money involuntarily held,” he said. “It usually doesn’t come to that.”
 
Founded in 1977, Hansen & Horn is building in more than 20 subdivisions in central Indiana, including Duke Realty Corp.’s mixed-use Anson development in Boone County near Whitestown. It replaced Los Angeles-based KB Home Inc., which backed out of plans to build in Anson when it exited the Indiana market in July 2007.

Hansen & Horn anticipates building 168 houses priced at $180,000 and above in a first phase. Additional phases could result in a total of 680 houses. Six homes have been built so far, with two more under construction.

Altogether, the homebuilder has been named in at least 20 lawsuits in Marion County in the past 10 years. But the 12 filed so far this year are concerning to Steve Lains, CEO of the Builders Association of Greater Indianapolis. Several Hansen & Horn homebuyers also have complained that their houses aren't getting built.

BAGI revoked Hansen & Horn’s membership earlier this year after the company failed to pay for services the organization provided. Lains declined to specify how much Hansen & Horn owes but said it is a “significant” amount.

“Typically, builders work hard at trying to make sure they have strong customer relations, because a lot of this business is based on referrals,” Lains said. “Lawsuits are not a quick and common occurrence in the industry; that’s not to say they don’t happen.”

The damages sought by parties suing Hansen & Horn range from $6,536 to $250,000.

The largest amount involves charges that the homebuilder failed to finish a house it was constructing on West 82nd Street for Dr. Nedra Soltow, a physician at the Roudebush VA Medical Center.

The lawsuit said Soltow agreed in February to pay Hansen & Horn $309,928 to build a home on her property. The money, paid up front, was to be placed in an escrow account.

Construction began, but after several delays Soltow learned in July that the escrow account only contained $130,068.86, not enough to finish the home, according to court documents. 

“Soltow has good cause to believe Hansen & Horn has converted and misused Soltow’s funds and lacks adequate assets to complete the home,” the complaint said.

Soltow also said in the suit she’s been served with a mechanic’s lien in the amount of $14,000 by a subcontractor working on the home.

Her lawyer, E. Scott Treadway at Indianapolis firm Stewart & Irwin P.C., said another homebuilder since has been hired to finish the project.

“It’s been an enormous headache,” he said, “because that home was to be completed during the warm months.”

A judge assigned an arbitrator to the case earlier this month.

Other large lawsuits have been brought by the local office of Orlando-based Creative Touch Interiors, which is seeking $162,976.39, and R.T. Moore Co. Inc., an Indianapolis-based mechanical contractor that claims it is owed $117,989.01.

Hansen & Horn is counter-suing in several of the lawsuits, claiming breach of contract.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT