IBJNews

Turner gets digital rights to NCAA championships

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Turner Sports and the NCAA announced a 14-year digital rights deal Tuesday that includes management of NCAA.com, the primary web site for all 88 NCAA tournaments and other services.

"We're doing this for a couple of reasons, and we would never do a stupid economic deal," said Lenny Daniels, executive vice president and chief operating officer of Turner Sports. "The long-term television world is going to change, and we think everything is, eventually, going to be interconnected."

Financial terms were not immediately disclosed.

If Daniels is right, Turner Sports' second major coup with the NCAA in five months may put the network in a stronger position to land future contracts.

In April, Turner and CBS announced they were teaming up as broadcast partners for the NCAA's marquee event, the men's basketball tournament, winning a bidding war with a 14-year, $10.8 billion deal that means each game will be broadcast live for the first time in the 73-year history of the event. The Indianapolis-based NCAA will get an additional $740 million per year, on average, from that deal — money it says will go back to individual schools and conferences.

But Turner Sports could be the big winner.

Beginning this season, Turner will carry games on three of its cable channels (TBS, TNT and truTV), will begin alternating title game broadcasts with CBS in 2016 and now holds digital rights to all NCAA championships across all three divisions.

"I think people won't understand until March how prominent their (Turner's) role is going to be in this agreement," said Greg Shaheen, the NCAA's interim executive vice president of championships and business strategies. "The tournament is going to have a different look and a different feel and how it is covered will be a much better experience for the viewer. They (Turner) are the ones who did a lot of the homework on this and they're formidable."

Turner already has operational oversight of March Madness On Demand, which drew 3 million viewers on the first Thursday of last season's NCAA tourney, as part of its television deal with CBS.

While the governing body's primary web site, NCAA.org, will continue to be run by the national office, Turner Sports wants to add the other NCAA digital platforms to its long list of successful web sites. Among those already being managed or operated by Turner are NASCAR.com, PGATOUR.com and PGA.com and NBA.com and WNBA.com.

Turner Sports is a division of Time Warner Inc.'s Turner Broadcasting System Inc., based in Atlanta. It also oversees the operation of SI.com.

What will change on the NCAA sites is not exactly clear yet.

Daniels said Turner Sports is still researching what Internet surfers want to see. He's already committed to adding more live coverage and more highlights from championship events.

Shaheen hopes to see more coverage of "The Road to the Final Four," though it is unlikely to include open coverage of the currently closed-door selection process.

"We're going to see if something is missing," Daniels said. "If you look across the whole college sports world, you'll see it (Internet coverage) is pretty fragmented. We want this to become the place you go to for college sports."

The free streaming, on-demand services could also get a facelift.

"We would expect March Madness on Demand to take the next step forward," Shaheen said, though he didn't explain what that would be. "I'll defer to the experts, but they know we want to explore what provides the best possible experience for the viewer."

Shaheen also acknowledged that the twin 14-year deals were no coincidence.

Turner Sports started discussing the digital rights while it was still working on the men's basketball television deal, and the negotiations continued through the summer.

Turner has agreed to cover the cost of the upgrades, and the NCAA will still retain the right to make money from digital services.

"It really is a commitment by Turner to handle the startup and the overall expense and over time, depending on the site's performance," Shaheen said. "The association has the opportunity to share (in profits) as it goes forward."

ADVERTISEMENT

  • You seen NASCAR.COM?
    Sorry "less better" = worse. :)
  • You seen NASCAR.COM?
    I hope Turner runs the NCAA website better than they do NASCAR Interactive and NASCAR.com. After the 2001 TV contract and Turner took over NASCAR's web prescence, innovation went down and fees went up and up. What was free then cost money and it was less better than the old free parts that NASCAR had done for them. AND NASCAR.com is only now, looking at least half way professional but others still do it better.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT