Tutwiler auto dealership closes after 48 years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Tutwiler Automotive, a car dealer that got its start in Indianapolis in 1964, has closed shop two years after losing its ability to sell new Cadillacs.

The dealership, located near 101st and Meridian streets, had long been known as Tutwiler Cadillac before changing its name in late 2010 when General Motors refused to renew its franchise agreement.

The dealership closed Saturday. About three-dozen used vehicles remained on the lot Monday. Phone calls to the business go unanswered.

It’s unclear whether Tutwiler owns the property north of Interstate 465 or what it plans to do with the land.

Mart Tutwiler of Carmel owns the dealership that his father, Ed, started after moving to Indianapolis from Charleston, W.V., nearly five decades ago.

Mart’s son Ed, the general manager at Tutwiler, did not return a phone calls from IBJ seeking comment.

Tutwiler was one of dozens of dealerships in Indiana and hundreds nationwide whose franchises GM discontinued in July 2009 after the company filed for bankruptcy.

Tutwiler fought to keep its franchise with GM but lost in arbitration in the summer of 2010.

Lockhart Cadillac, the lone remaining Cadillac dealer in the Indianapolis area, sells vehicles from its locations on 126th Street in Fishers and U.S. 31 in Greenwood.

In addition to selling used cars, Tutwiler sold parts and performed non-warranty service work after losing its franchise.

Nationwide, 1,233 GM franchise agreements were terminated in 2010.

In Indiana, the number of new-car dealerships in the past five years has dropped 18 percent, to 429, according to the National Automobile Dealers Association.


  • Just purchased a car there last week
    I just purchased a used Cadillac there last week. I was very happy with my out the door price. They are still selling cars
  • Yep
    Agree with most of the posts here. All of us - including Tutwiler - would be better off now if Obama and his Marxist fellow travelers had simply let GM go out of business.
  • who'd buy....
    ...a poorly designed, engineered and built Cadillac when you can get a top of the line Honda Accord with all the bells/ whistles for half the price of an ugly Cadillac CTS, and the Honda is made in Ohio with Indiana parts! Srsly I can't even imagine buying a Cadillac even if I was an old man wearing white belt and shoes
  • Moving on...
    As someone who lives in this vicinity, what is Indianapolis/Carmel going to do with this property in such a prime location? Let's hope it doesn't just sit there and mother nature takes over.
  • never made sense
    I am not sure why the Barak Obama/new GM Co decided to retract longstanding retail outlets for their products at a time the company was floundering. Most of these dealers purchased the cars on their lot thru lending plans - and I would think the the more sales outlets the better the chances of GM to compete with their competitors. It's not like GM had anything to lose keeping these guys on board.
  • Bush Era policies might be to blame
    I'm not sure...but if I'm correct GM was going down LONG BEFORE Obama came into office...What about cleaning up their act during the Bush 1 and Clinto and Bush 2 ERA??? Its not like OOHH Obama came into office and ALL OF THE SUDDEN GM went downhill...that's like blaming you for Indiana's failing school system!!!
  • Capitalism
    If all of those dealerships were selling enough cars GM would have kept them open. They let dealerships proliferate in the 90's and early 2000's to a point where they were cannibalizing themselves. Chrysler did the same thing. Family owned businesses that believe they will always have descendents that can lead business through ever changing economic and competitive environments, are not long for this world. At some point the son or niece will not have the capability and they will need to go to the outside for the right skills. The strong will survive.
    Yeah...the socialst appointed one also caused 100s of suppliers to close from the GM bailout and lost millions. Now Forbes is projecting that GM may file bankrupcy in 2013. Wonder why we hate liberals? Because they've owned a business. All they know is the first 3 pages of how to run a business 101.
  • Obama's Planned Economy
    Thousands of workers were thrown out of work when Obama nationalized GM, gave it to the unions, then forced non-politically (non-minority) connected dealers to close.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

    2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

    3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

    4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

    5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.