IBJNews

Longtime local Cadillac dealer loses fight to sell car

Back to TopE-mailPrint

An automobile dealer that has sold Cadillacs in the Indianapolis area for almost five decades has lost its franchise to sell new models of the famous luxury brand.

Tutwiler Cadillac, near 101st and Meridian streets, changed its name to Tutwiler Automotive earlier this fall when its General Motors franchise agreement expired. The dealership, which has sold Cadillacs in Indianapolis since 1964, will remain in business selling used cars.

It was one of dozens of dealerships in Indiana and hundreds nationwide whose franchises GM discontinued in July 2009 after the company filed for bankruptcy. GM, which was buoyed with $50 billion in taxpayer funds, since has improved its financial state; its share price has ranged between $33 and $36 since the company’s stock went back on the market last month.

But that hasn’t changed the fate of outfits such as Tutwiler. The dealership fought to keep its franchise through arbitration with GM that ended this summer. Tutwiler prevailed on some fronts of its argument but lost the overall case, said Ronald C. Smith, a Stewart & Irwin attorney who represented Tutwiler in the case.

Smith would not elaborate on details of Tutwiler’s argument. But he said the company’s market plan was to have one area dealership offering Cadillacs, similar to the one-dealer strategy employed by other luxury automakers such as Lexus, Mercedes and Infinity. GM officials would not comment on the strategy.

Another local dealer, Lockhart Cadillac, sells the vehicles from its locations on North Keystone Avenue in Indianapolis and in Greenwood.

"You've got two quality families who have been on the local auto scene for decades," Smith said. "It's unfortunate the manufacturer decided it had to choose."

Nationwide, 1,233 GM franchise agreements were terminated on Oct. 31. The number of active franchises in Indiana has declined from 400 last December to 250 at the end of last month, said Ryndee Carney, a GM spokeswoman. The number of GM dealerships also has dropped from 170 to 138 statewide.

Carney would not comment on specific dealerships because the company did not publicly identify which dealers lost their franchises. But Carney said GM generally based its decisions about ending franchises on factors such as sales, profitability, working capital, location and customer satisfaction.

“We felt we came through the process with the right number of dealers,” Carney said. “We think the makeup and size of dealer network we have today gives us a competitive advantage.”

However, a July 2010 report by the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program showed that those criteria were applied inconsistently.  

Mart Tutwiler, Carmel, now owns the dealership that his father, Ed, started after moving to Indianapolis from Charleston, W.V. Mart's son Ed, the general manager at Tutwiler, said the termination “was a shock,” but the company would use the opportunity to grow the dealership’s pre-owned business.  

In addition to selling used cars, Tutwiler will continue selling parts and performing non-warranty service work.

“We have customers that are upset with the decision for closure, but I want them to know that we are still here. Our doors are open,” the general manager said. “We look at this as an opportunity.”

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT