Two downtown office towers poised to get new asset manager

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Two of downtown’s largest office buildings soon could have new asset managers following a shakeup at the publicly traded real estate investment trust that owns them.

The 1.1-million-square-foot Chase Tower and 649,500-square-foot PNC Center are both owned by suburban Boston-based CommonWealth REIT, which was the target of an investor campaign that led to the ouster of its board in March.

CommonWealth shareholders now are set May 23 to elect a new board led by billionaire investor Sam Zell of Zell’s Equity Group Investments.

Chase Tower 15colThe 1.1-million-square-foot Chase Tower could have a new asset manager as Class A office buildings struggle with vacancies. (IBJ Photo)

Chicago-based Equity Group Investments would replace REIT Management & Research LLC, or RMR, as asset manager of Chase Tower and PNC Center. RMR is owned outright by CommonWealth President Adam Portnoy and his father, Barry, a company founder—a connection that shareholder activists argued led the Portnoys to favor that business over the interests of CommonWealth.

Asset managers play an important role in building ownership, working with property managers and leasing agents to ensure the property performs well. If Zell’s Equity Group Investments assumes those duties, it would represent a strange twist for the 48-story Chase Tower, the state’s largest office building, which Equity Group Investments once owned.

“[CommonWealth] does not have a board of trustees at this point and the company expects that a board will be in place following the May 23rd vote,” CommonWealth said in a written statement to IBJ. “Ongoing management of these properties will be determined by the new board.”

Downtown office brokers would welcome the change in management, said one who declined to be named because he interacts with current management.

“RMR did not have a good reputation in any market they’re in as being broker-friendly,” he said. “It was essentially a my-way-or-the-highway mentality.”

Asset managers play an important role in building ownership, working with property managers and leasing agents to ensure the property performs well.

The change to Equity Group Investments would come at a critical time for Chase Tower, whose 91-percent occupancy rate could take a hit from more vacancies.

Merrill Lynch is giving up a floor and a half, or 26,000 square feet, when it consolidates local operations in January by moving the downtown office to Parkwood Crossing on the north side.

ProLiance Energy has yet to sublease the 18,500 square feet it occupied iin the building. The company vacated the space after selling to Dallas-based Energy Transfer Partners in June.

And, most significant, when banking giant Chase recently extended its lease from 2020 to 2025, it negotiated the right to vacate and sublease floors 11 through 14, local brokers say.

The local office of Chicago-based Jones Lang LaSalle leases Chase Tower.

What’s occurring at Chase Tower is a microcosm of the overall downtown office market, particularly in the traditional towers.

The vacancy rate among downtown’s priciest office digs, or Class A space, stood at 21.4 percent at the end of last year, more than a percentage point higher than downtown’s overall office vacancy rate of 20.3 percent, according to Cassidy Turley statistics.

CommonWealth REIT has owned Chase Tower about two years. The company paid $201 million in July 2012 to buy it from Boston-based Beacon Capital Partners.

In March, shareholders voted to oust Commonwealth's board, including the Portnoys, on grounds their ownership of RMR led to conflicts of interest and underperformance, according to Bloomberg News.

Bloomberg reported that the shareholder group had argued that the Portnoys were more concerned about collecting fees for the management firm than operating CommonWealth, which pays fees to RMR.

As of December 2012, CommonWealth owned 440 properties totaling 71.9 million square feet, representing a $7.8 billion investment, according to its latest annual report.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Aaron is my fav!

  2. Let's see... $25M construction cost, they get $7.5M back from federal taxpayers, they're exempt from business property tax and use tax so that's about $2.5M PER YEAR they don't have to pay, permitting fees are cut in half for such projects, IPL will give them $4K under an incentive program, and under IPL's VFIT they'll be selling the power to IPL at 20 cents / kwh, nearly triple what a gas plant gets, about $6M / year for the 150-acre combined farms, and all of which is passed on to IPL customers. No jobs will be created either other than an handful of installers for a few weeks. Now here's the fun part...the panels (from CHINA) only cost about $5M on Alibaba, so where's the rest of the $25M going? Are they marking up the price to drive up the federal rebate? Indy Airport Solar Partners II LLC is owned by local firms Johnson-Melloh Solutions and Telemon Corp. They'll gross $6M / year in triple-rate power revenue, get another $12M next year from taxpayers for this new farm, on top of the $12M they got from taxpayers this year for the first farm, and have only laid out about $10-12M in materials plus installation labor for both farms combined, and $500K / year in annual land lease for both farms (est.). Over 15 years, that's over $70M net profit on a $12M investment, all from our wallets. What a boondoggle. It's time to wise up and give Thorium Energy your serious consideration. See http://energyfromthorium.com to learn more.

  3. Markus, I don't think a $2 Billion dollar surplus qualifies as saying we are out of money. Privatization does work. The government should only do what private industry can't or won't. What is proven is that any time the government tries to do something it costs more, comes in late and usually is lower quality.

  4. Some of the licenses that were added during Daniels' administration, such as requiring waiter/waitresses to be licensed to serve alcohol, are simply a way to generate revenue. At $35/server every 3 years, the state is generating millions of dollars on the backs of people who really need/want to work.

  5. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...