U.S. Chamber backs Lugar in heated GOP primary

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce became the latest national interest group to stake a claim in Indiana's heated Republican Senate primary, announcing Tuesday it is endorsing U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar in his toughest re-election battle in decades.

The national business organization joined local business groups, including the Indiana Chamber of Commerce and Indiana Manufacturers Association, who announced their support for Lugar last week.

Conservative interest groups, like the National Rifle Association and the anti-tax Club for Growth, have lined up firmly behind Indiana Treasurer Richard Mourdock, who is challenging Lugar in the May 8 Republican primary.

The endorsements show a split between the old guard, which tends to favor incumbents, and more ideological groups which often have no problem bucking the system, said Margaret Ferguson, who heads the political science department at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.

Historically, major interest groups like the chamber have given money to incumbents based on the assumption they would win re-election, she said.

"The chamber is kind of an old-school conservative, mainline conservative group," she said. "Giving money to a candidate that doesn't win doesn't do you any good whatsoever."

Lugar is facing his toughest re-election battle since 1982 in large part because of tea party resentment over votes he's taken in the Senate, but also because of a series of political stumbles that have played into opponents arguments that he is out of touch with Hoosiers.

US Chamber spokeswoman Blair Latoff called Lugar a "long-time ally" of local Indiana businesses. She would not say how much the chamber would spend supporting Lugar, however they already sunk $238,000 into ads supporting Lugar's push for construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which would bring oil from Canada into the U.S.

A series of polls have shown Mourdock within striking distance of Lugar with less than three weeks before the primary. The closeness of the battle has spurred outside groups to flood Indiana's airwaves with ads attacking both candidates.

A handful of groups have gone well beyond nominal endorsements and put extensive money behind Mourdock's campaign. Club for Growth has far outspent other groups, buying close to $1.25 million in airtime as of Tuesday.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.