IBJNews

U.S. losing drug-research jobs to other countries

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The U.S. risks losing thousands of research jobs as countries led by Singapore, Ireland and South Africa boost incentives to woo drugmakers, said John Castellani, head of a pharmaceutical industry lobbying group.

Those countries are outpacing the U.S. with tax incentives, increases in government research spending and efforts to train scientists, according to a study released Thursday by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. That has many U.S. companies considering shifting their investment overseas, according to the lobbying group that represents most of the largest drugmakers.

Indianapolis-based Eli Lilly and Co., for example, plans to invest $420 million in a new pharmaceutical plant in Ireland. London-based GlaxoSmithKline Plc opened a $600 million vaccine plant in Singapore in 2009. Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, N.J., is looking to buy Chinese companies with treatments for mental illness and cancer, the company’s China unit head said this week.

The pharmaceutical industry spends more on research than any other industry in the U.S. and employs 650,000 people, according to PhRMA. Drugmakers have been under pressure to cut costs as they brace to lose $120 billion in sales to generic competition by 2015 in the U.S. and Europe, according to IMS Health Inc. Drugmakers are looking outside the U.S. for growth and savings.

“It is getting very, very competitive in the world as everyone tries to attract this business,” Castellani said. “These are the best jobs you can create in an economy. These are the highest-multiplier, best-paid workers, the ones that drive the biggest bang for your investment dollar, and the rest of the world knows that.”

Castellani said PhRMA will lobby Congress to make the research-and-development tax credit permanent and fight any efforts to limit the incentive, which enables tax reductions made on the basis of how much they spend on developing new products. He is also pushing to limit cuts to drug spending in Medicare and Medicaid, the U.S. health programs for the elderly, disabled and poor. A $20 billion drop in revenue for drugmakers could lead to 260,000 job cuts, PhRMA said.

Efforts by the U.S. to keep companies may have little benefit as most of the growth in the pharmaceutical sector will be in emerging markets, said Christopher-Paul Milne, associate director for the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Spending on drugs in emerging markets, such as China, India and Brazil, is set to double in the next five years to as much as $315 billion—about the size of the U.S. market, according to IMS, a Danbury, Conn.-based company that analyzes health trends.

“It is a global industry and has been and it is going to continue to further globalize,” Milne said. “It has spread out from being U.S.-centric to more U.S., Europe and Japan, to now being worldwide.”

To lure companies, Singapore’s government has been pushing to recruit and train researchers, and has one of the highest rates in the world with about 6,000 researchers for every 1 million citizens, according to the PhRMA study. It also offers a tax deduction of 150 percent for research expenses. As a result, pharmaceutical exports have increased 274 percent since 2000.

Ireland has created programs to fund research, such as $4.6 billion in basic research grants, and offers a 25-percent research tax credit and one of the lowest corporate tax rates of 12.5 percent, according to the report.

Castellani is going to China this week to meet with Chinese companies that are trying to attract foreign investment to build a biotech and pharmaceutical sector there.

“As we go around the world, we are seeing countries develop very aggressive innovation strategies,” Castellani said. “We don’t see the U.S. doing the same thing.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Taxes have actually reduced.
    Taxes have gone up only in your mind because that is what you wish to believe. The truth is taxes have gone lower than during the Bush Presidency. There was an attempt to raise taxes on the rich but that never succeeded.

    Businesses will move to any country as long as there is profit to be made even if the taxes are higher. If a $ 1 product is sold in a county with 30 % taxes and there are only 100,000 customers, then the revenue is $ 70.000. If the same product is sold in a country with 50 % taxes and 200,000 are sold , then the revenue is $ 100,000. $ 30,000 more than the country with lower tax.
  • Thanks Obama
    Thanks Obama and your merry henchmen for making sure that big business is not welcome in this country. Support for the unions and the unacceptable taxation at the highest rates in history with only promises of more inreases has forces businesses to go places that they feel welcome. Vote NOBAMA 2012. Save our country

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Of what value is selling alcoholic beverages to State Fair patrons when there are many families with children attending. Is this the message we want to give children attending and participating in the Fair, another venue with alooholic consumption onsite. Is this to promote beer and wine production in the state which are great for the breweries and wineries, but where does this end up 10-15 years from now, lots more drinkers for the alcoholic contents. If these drinks are so important, why not remove the alcohol content and the flavor and drink itself similar to soft drinks would be the novelty, not the alcoholic content and its affects on the drinker. There is no social or material benefit from drinking alcoholic beverages, mostly people want to get slightly or highly drunk.

  2. I did;nt know anyone in Indiana could count- WHY did they NOT SAY just HOW this would be enforced? Because it WON;T! NOW- with that said- BIG BROTHER is ALIVE in this Article-why take any comment if it won't appease YOU PEOPLE- that's NOT American- with EVERYTHING you indicated is NOT said-I can see WHY it say's o Comments- YOU are COMMIES- BIG BROTHER and most likely- voted for Obama!

  3. In Europe there are schools for hairdressing but you don't get a license afterwards but you are required to assist in turkey and Italy its 7 years in japan it's 10 years England 2 so these people who assist know how to do hair their not just anybody and if your an owner and you hire someone with no experience then ur an idiot I've known stylist from different countries with no license but they are professional clean and safe they have no license but they have experience a license doesn't mean anything look at all the bad hairdressers in the world that have fried peoples hair okay but they have a license doesn't make them a professional at their job I think they should get rid of it because stateboard robs stylist and owners and they fine you for the dumbest f***ing things oh ur license isn't displayed 100$ oh ur wearing open toe shoes fine, oh there's ONE HAIR IN UR BRUSH that's a fine it's like really? So I think they need to go or ease up on their regulations because their too strict

  4. Exciting times in Carmel.

  5. Twenty years ago when we moved to Indy I was a stay at home mom and knew not very many people.WIBC was my family and friends for the most part. It was informative, civil, and humerous with Dave the KING. Terri, Jeff, Stever, Big Joe, Matt, Pat and Crumie. I loved them all, and they seemed to love each other. I didn't mind Greg Garrison, but I was not a Rush fan. NOW I can't stand Chicks and all their giggly opinions. Tony Katz is to abrasive that early in the morning(or really any time). I will tune in on Saturday morning for the usual fun and priceless information from Pat and Crumie, mornings it will be 90.1

ADVERTISEMENT