UAW says deal with GM creates or keeps 6,400 jobs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

In exchange for an agreement to create 5,100 union jobs in the U.S., General Motors will hire thousands of less expensive employees and try to replace some longtime workers.

The offer is part of a tentative new contract between the automaker and United Auto Workers that union leaders recommended to their membership on Tuesday. Now, nearly 50,000 workers at GM must vote to accept or reject the four-year contract.

The contract also includes a $5,000 signing bonus and profit-sharing checks if GM earns a minimum of $1.25 billion in North America annually. Those payments, and others, will replace annual raises for most workers.

UAW President Bob King hailed the deal as a sign the union and industry can cooperate to save American jobs. And at least one local union leader predicted workers would accept the contract, the first since GM and Chrysler made it through bankruptcy in 2009 after receiving government bailouts.

"The auto industry is back. General Motors and the UAW are working together to create jobs in America," King said at union leader meeting Tuesday in Detroit.

At the meeting, union leaders were briefed on details of the proposed contract.

The union said that under the deal, GM has agreed to create or keep the jobs and invest in its factories, including the reopening of an assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tenn. The Spring Hill plant will make two midsize cars, according to a summary of the agreement released by the UAW. The work originally was slated for Mexico, the union said.

GM will invest $61 million for one of the cars and add 600 jobs, while it will spend $358 million on the other car with 1,100 jobs created.

Other factories scheduled to get new work under the deal include:

— Wentzville, Mo.: Gets additional shift plus a midsize pickup truck. A $380 million investment and 1,850 new jobs.

— Warren, Mich.: Transmission plant near Detroit gets new transmission. A $325 million investment and 360 new jobs.

— Romulus, Mich.: Engine plant near Detroit gets $385 million investment and 285 jobs.

— Saginaw, Mich: Casting plant gets 255 jobs and $215 million investment.

— Fort Wayne: Truck assembly plant gets next-generation pickups, with a $230 million investment and 150 jobs created or retained.

In addition, GM will build a new compact car at a factory that's yet to be determined. It will create more than 500 jobs with a $150 million investment.

The summary of the deal said GM's assembly plant in Shreveport, La., will close as scheduled, while a plant in Janesville, Wis., will remain idled.

The deal raises GM's recurring costs only minimally and keeps its financial break-even point steady, a person briefed on the deal said. The person didn't want to be identified because the contract has not been ratified.

The union will use the contract as a model for separate labor deals with Detroit's two other automakers — Chrysler Group LLC and Ford Motor Co. Nearly 113,000 auto workers would be covered by the UAW contracts at the three companies. The contracts would also set the bar for pay and benefits at nonunion auto companies and other industries across the country.

The GM-UAW deal creates more than 5,100 factory jobs and opens up 1,300 jobs for skilled workers such as electricians and welders. That means the contract preserves or adds a total of 6,400 jobs, the UAW said. The skilled work is now done by outside contractors, but UAW workers will be able to bid on it. The union said much of the work is being brought back from Mexico.

In return, GM will try to entice older employees to leave so it can hire new ones at a wage that's about half the $29 per hour veterans make. Eligible workers can get up to $10,000 if they retire within the next two years. There's also a $65,000 bonus for skilled-trades workers if they retire or leave the company between Nov. 1 and March 31.

For most workers who don't retire, they'll be new kinds of compensation that replace annual raises. Most workers will get profit-sharing checks and other payments that could total at least $12,500. That includes the $5,000 signing bonus, a minimum of $3,500 in profit-sharing next year and $250 for meeting quality standards for each of the contract's four years. They'll also get three $1,000 bonuses to offset inflation.

If GM makes more money, the checks could be bigger.

Workers who make entry-level wages will get raises. GM's 1,940 entry-level workers will see wages go up as much as 24 percent during the contract. Workers who now make $14.78 per hour will see that increase to $18.28. The company also has around 500 temporary workers who will get smaller wage increases.

GM has also agreed to invest $2.5 billion in its factories, and will reopen an assembly plant in Spring Hill, Tenn. Union-company teams also are identifying 760 more potential jobs at GM and 1,400 more jobs for UAW-represented parts suppliers. Those jobs are in addition to the 6,400.

Dave Green, president of a UAW local at GM's factory complex in Lordstown, Ohio, east of Cleveland, predicted that workers will approve the contract.

Even though it has no pay raises for longtime workers, Green said it has signing bonuses, inflation protection and profit-sharing that workers should like.

"I think that it's pretty fair and gives our members incentives to make sure we continue to build a quality product," he said.

He also said the raises for entry-level workers puts their pay above what some foreign automakers pay at U.S. factories. That should help the UAW with efforts to organize those plants, he said. Organizing workers at foreign-owned plants is one of King's priorities.

But Nick Waun, an assembly line worker who makes the Chevrolet Cruze compact in Lordstown, said workers are unhappy because the deal has no cost-of-living pay raises and no ability for entry-level workers to get the same high wages as more senior workers. Without annual raises, veteran workers will eventually be paid the same rate as new employees.

"Inflation will keep chipping away at the top wage," Waun said.

King said he hasn't decided if the union will start talks with Chrysler and Ford next. He wouldn't discuss an angry letter sent last week by Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne accusing King of missing a meeting to sign a new deal.

"We have a great relationship with Chrysler, with Sergio, with all the Chrysler management," King said. "We're working together, as we did here, to create more jobs."

Marchionne was on his way back to the U.S. from Europe on Tuesday and may take part in the talks.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Only half a million TV Viewers? And thats an increase? I knew Indycar was struggling but I didn't know it was that bad. Hell, if NASCAR hits 5 Million viewers everyone starts freaking out saying its going down hill. It has a long way to before Indycar even hits NASCAR's bad days.

  2. IU has been talking that line for years with no real progress even with the last Dean, Dr. Brater. Why will an outsider, Dr. Hess, make a difference? With no proof of additional resources (cash in the bank), and a concrete plan to move an academic model that has been outdated for decades with a faculty complacent with tenure and inertia, I can count on IU to remain the same during the tenure of Dr. Hess. One ought to look to Purdue and Notre Dame for change and innovation. It is just too bad that both of those schools do not have their own medical school. Competition might wake up IU. My guess is, that even with those additions to our State, IU will remain in its own little world squandering our State's tax dollars. Why would any donor want to contribute to IU with its track record? What is its strategy to deal with the physician shortage for our State? New leadership will not be enough for us to expect any change.

  3. How do you think the Bridges got approved? I spent a couple days researching PAC's and individual contributions to some city council members during that time. My printouts were inches thick on the two I concentrated on. Finally gave up. Was disgusted with all the donations, and who they were from. Would have taken me days and days to compile a complete list. Tried to give it to the Star reporter, but he thought it was all just fine. (and apparently he was treated well himself) He ended up being laid off or fired though. And then of course, there was land donated to the dad's club, or city, as a partial payoff. All done in the shining example of "charity." No, none of these contributions are a coincidence.

  4. I agree what kind of help or if any will be there for Dr. Ley's patients. I was a patient myself.

  5. What about the hundreds of patients who sought this doctor for the right reasons, to quit drugs. what option do these patients now have, experience horrible withdrawl or return to heroin?? those are the choices. what about the children of these former addicts who's parent(s) WILL not b able to maintain their job, for @ least 2 weeks.. There needs to b an emergency clinic opened for these patients.