IBJNews

Unemployment aid applications hit 2-month low

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The number of Americans seeking unemployment benefits plunged 26,000 last week, to a seasonally adjusted 359,000, a hopeful sign for the job market. It's the lowest level of weekly applications in nine weeks.

The Labor Department said Thursday that the four-week average, a less volatile measure, declined 4,500, to 374,000. That's the first drop in six weeks.

Weekly unemployment applications are a measure of the pace of layoffs. When they consistently fall below 375,000, it typically indicates that hiring is strong enough to lower the unemployment rate. The weekly figures can be volatile, causing most economists to focus on the four-week average.

Economists were mildly encouraged by the figures. Still, many still expect the government's employment report for September to show only modest job gains, perhaps about 100,000. That's about the same as in August. The September jobs report will be released next week.

The past few reports on applications for unemployment benefits "suggest no significant acceleration or deceleration in employment growth," said Jim O'Sullivan, an economist at High Frequency Economics.

Other economic figures released Thursday were mainly disappointing. Businesses cut orders for long-lasting manufactured goods in August. And the government reduced its estimate of economic growth in the April-June quarter to 1.3 percent from 1.7 percent.

Still, the decline in estimated growth for the second quarter was due mainly to reduced farm production stemming from this summer's drought. Once the effects of the drought ease and crop supplies rebound, the farm sector could boost economic growth, noted Paul Ashworth, an economist at Capital Economics.

Layoffs have fallen to the lowest level in a decade, according to a government report earlier this month. But hiring hasn't picked up enough to quickly lower the unemployment rate.

U.S. employers added only 96,000 jobs last month, below the 141,000 in July and much lower than the average 226,000 added in the first three months of the year.

The unemployment rate dropped in August, to 8.1 percent from 8.3 percent, but only because the number of people working or looking for work fell.

The economy isn't growing fast enough to support much more hiring. It grew at a weak 1.3-percent annual rate in the April-June quarter, down from 2 percent in the January-March quarter and 4.1 percent in the final three months of last year.

Growth isn't likely to get much better for the rest of this year. Economists expect it to grow at a roughly 2-percent pace. That's typically too weak to create enough jobs to lower the unemployment rate.

A survey of chief executives, released Wednesday, found a sharp drop in the number of large companies that plan to step up hiring or boost investment in the next six months. They cited worries over tax and budget policies in the United States and slower growth in Europe and China for the gloomier outlook.

Some recent indicators have been more optimistic. Consumer confidence jumped to a seven-month high in September, the Conference Board said Tuesday. Home prices are rising steadily nationwide. And sales of new homes remained near a two-year high in August, the Commerce Department said Wednesday.

The unemployment applications report showed that the number of people receiving benefits fell slightly. About 5.17 million people received unemployment aid in the week ending Sept. 8, the latest figures available. That's 11,000 lower than the previous week.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Who is the Labor Department KIDDING
    Many of us that were let loose from our jobs over the last couple of years were 60 and over. Our unemployment benefits have run out. I agree with many of the comments above, the Department of Labor is just looking for ways to say the unemployment rate has dropped. It is sad that many employers as well as the Department of Labor figured a way to cut their expenses and claim no contest for those who can not find a job. If you listen to the politicians "Supposely Happy Days are here again". The reality is simple the unemployment rate is closer to 12 to 15 %, because people exhausted their benefits, savings, not finding jobs,and future in some cases. Who is everyone kidding!!!
  • Exactly
    Time to start actually thinking about what the media serves up to us instead of taking everything at their word. unemployment rates dont include the people giving up looking for work, unemployment aid does not include those no longer eligible and going to welfare and food stamps, and Obama's lead in the polls often don't come with the disclaimer that the poll is heavily skewed by polling a large percentage more democrats. Media is doing everything in their power to elect Obama
  • Agree W/ Becky
    The figures d thier show a decrease in unemployment because people like me have exhausted thier benefits and cannot file for 4th tier and are using any extra money like savings, borrowing from family, taking a one day job or etc and still can't find even part timme employment.
  • Not always as they seem
    I always wonder if these numbers take into account the fact that some people have been on unemployment so long that they no longer have any benefits coming to them but have been unable to find employment. Therefore they are still unemployed but are not filing any claims.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

    2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

    3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

    4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

    5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

    ADVERTISEMENT