IBJOpinion

Union backer has vested interest

January 22, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

The reason [Teresa] Meredith is so gung-ho regarding her union stance is she has so much to lose: 18 years into her profession, vice president of the Indiana State Teachers Association, her pension and benefits.

Meredith’s 10-point outline clearly focused on the real agenda. I counted her words and how she used them to convey her interests regarding teachers and their pay compensation/benefits. It defines why the children are “left behind.”

• Compensation, resources, pay, benefits, contract, benefits, negotiations, grievances, allowances, bargaining and compensation—11 mentions [combined].

• Teachers—9 mentions.

• Students—6 mentions.

This should make David Letterman’s  “top 3” “What is important under collective bargaining”:

• Money is mentioned nearly twice as much as the children.

• Teachers run a close second.

• Students rank last in this self-serving agenda.

How can Meredith honestly sell the notion “the students” will achieve more under the big hand of a union, when her outline focuses mainly on money and teachers?

Can Teresa explain why there has been and still is such a deluge of private schools (not unionized) over the past decades doing so well with academics? Conversely, public (government-run) education continues to decline, with alarming statistics, while sucking taxpayers dry and still needing more money.

Enough is enough. After 38 years of unionization of the school system, if they don’t have it together by now, it should cease to exist and we should not look back.

Hats off to the former lieutenant governor, president of Lilly Endowment and PSI Energy, who was quoted, “My vote for collective bargaining rights for teachers was a big mistake … a whopper.” Thanks to John Mutz for the integrity it took to admit this mistake. I think it would behoove Meredith to make a phone call to Mutz.

Kirby South
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Teachers want compensation like you-its life.
    When you go in for your annual review do you spend the time encouraging your boss to spend money on improving the company or are you interested in at least keeping up with inflation and getting a raise? Educators as a whole are one of the most educated groups of professionals that deal with a lot of very adverse conditions and make quick decisions on a "minutely" basis, not hourly. Its time their compensation reflects that. I've seen first hand how teachers motivate all kinds of students. Believe me, normally the struggling student is accompanied by "extra" struggles outside of school and little support at home. Our educators do a marvelous job when given their due and the needed resources.
  • It works both ways
    Regarding Kirby South's letter blasting Teresa Merfedith for defending collective bargaining, I think he misses the point. But that aside, if you replaced Teresa's name with the name Gov. Daniels, and replaced her letter and comments with his "Putting Students First" agenda, you would find a strong correlation regarding one fact---the governor's agenda simply doen't mention students very much. However, he does mention spending cuts, saving money, cost, etc. lots of times. Quite simply, for the governor students are way down the list of his priorities.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

  2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

  3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

  4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

  5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

ADVERTISEMENT