Angie’s List CEO says IPO possible in 2011

 IBJ Staff and Bloomberg News
April 27, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Angie’s List Inc., a web service that provides consumer reviews to 1.5 million members, may decide to opt for an initial public offering as early as this year, CEO Bill Oesterle said.

The company last year hired Code Advisors, which has provided advice on previous funding and would help Angie’s list choose bankers in the case of an IPO. Code is also advising on potential opportunities to sell the site, Oesterle said. Angie’s List has rebuffed expressions of interest from prospective buyers, which were public companies, he said.

Angie’s list named Keith Krach as chairman and Robert Millard as chief financial officer earlier on Wednesday, appointments that may also presage plans for an IPO. A public share sale would help the Indianapolis-based startup raise money to pursue faster growth in the competitive consumer-reviews and daily-deals markets, where rivals include Facebook Inc., Groupon Inc. and Google Inc.

“We are certainly reaching a size, and have opportunities in front of us that are causing us to consider very seriously a public offering,” Oesterle said in a telephone interview. “We could make that decision this year.” IPO funds could be used to boost advertising on TV and radio, he said.

Angie’s list doesn’t formally disclose financial details. Oesterle said revenue rose 40 percent in 2010, and should increase at a faster pace this year. The company expects to end the year with 1.8 million members, up from 1.2 million at the beginning of the year, he said.

Founded in 1995 by Angie Hicks and Oesterle, Angie’s List provides ratings and reviews for more than 500 types of businesses.

Krach, a Purdue University graduate, is CEO of 3Points LLC, an investment holding company based in Los Gatos, Calif. He also is chairman of San Francisco-based DocuSign Corp. and of the Purdue University Board of Trustees.

Krach co-founded software giant Ariba Inc. in 1996 and served as CEO, taking the company public in 1999 and achieving market capitalization of $34 billion.

He earned a degree in industrial engineering from Purdue and an MBA from Harvard University.

Millard previously served as CFO at FinishMaster Inc., an Indianapolis-based national distributor of automotive coatings that was sold in January to Uni-Select Inc. Prior to that, Millard was CFO at Personnel Management Inc., a public company in Greenwood that was sold to a private equity firm.

“The goal is to accelerate the tremendous business momentum that Angie’s List already has,” Krach said in an interview. “At some point in the future, I am sure there will be an IPO, in the intermediate future.”

Pre-IPO companies often beef up management to add financial expertise and executives with experience taking businesses public.

“This is all according to the IPO playbook,” said Tom Taulli, an independent IPO analyst, said. “In order to go public, you need a strong board and a CFO who knows how to deal with Wall Street.”

In March, Angie’s List raised $53.6 million in a private share offering from investors including mutual-fund company T. Rowe Price Group Inc., which tends to invest in companies that are already public. Last year, Angie’s List said it raised $25 million from investors including venture firms Battery Ventures, Saints Capital, and Wasatch Funds.

The site, which provides recommendations on everything from roofing to medicine, would likely seek to raise $100 million to $200 million, Taulli said, valuing the company at more than $1 billion.



  • Heko
    we found a contractor from the Sept.-Oct. angie's list but lost the name and address. We would like to hire him to do the job,
  • ceo's
    i want to top ten ceo's list
  • Angie's May Get Too Big and Loose there Advantage
    Angie's List is a great concept but if they get too big can loose credibility if one of there
    service providers does something to a subscriber that makes headlines. Otherwise known as Negative Headline Risk.
  • not what it used to be
    Angie's List is avery good concept, although it is now a money making machine for the owners.Any company that gets one positve report is rated A, unlike the old days when Unified Neighbors you had to get more than one report.The reason it is done like this is because you have to have A or B rating to place discount ad in .If you pay the very costly ad you can get to top of list
  • Worthless
    This company is worthless .
    It shocks me as to how many cleaning services or decluttering companies there are that just throw recyclables, medications and 1/2 used bottles of toiletries or cleaning supplies.....aren't our landfills clogged enough? C'mon BABY BOOMERS- REDEEM YOURSELF! ENLIST A HOUSEKEEPER WHO VALUES THE ENVIRONMENT. TAKES THE EXTRA TIME TO RECYCLE WHEN YOU DOWNSIZE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I wouldn't Yellow Tag anything!
  • Angie list is a joke
    Stay away from Angie's list. It is a joke. If you really want to know infomation about a company check out with the attorney general

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.