IBJNews

UPDATE: Lilly settles pollution suit for $337,500

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Eli Lilly and Co. has settled a lawsuit with the federal government alleging the pharmaceutical manufacturer had emitted a high level of hazardous pollutants from its manufacturing plant on South Harding Street in Indianapolis.

The settlement, made available by the U.S. District Court in Indianapolis Friday afternoon, requires Eli Lilly to pay a $337,500 penalty within 30 days of the agreement.

IBJ reported on the government's lawsuit earlier Friday, before the settlement was made public. The original lawsuit said Lilly faced millions of dollars in fines for numerous violations.

“We are currently not exceeding any emission limits from that site and we have resolved those issues,” Eli Lilly spokeswoman Beth Hunter said. “We have addressed all the concerns that they had.”

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, stemmed from an on-site inspection of the plant in June 2006 by the Environmental Protection Agency that allegedly found high levels of acetonitrile and methanol, which are considered hazardous air pollutants.

Acetonitrile is used in the pharmaceutical industry as a solvent in the drug-purification process. Methanol is used in a wide variety of ways to produce various pharmaceutical products.

One of the drugs made at the plant is Forteo, an osteoporosis drug, according to the suit.

For all but one day, between March 6, 2004, and Jan. 11, 2007, hazardous air pollutant emissions were greater than 900 kilograms—an amount that cannot be exceeded—on a rolling 365-day period, the suit said.

The complaint alleged that Lilly also exceeded 1,800 kilograms of emissions on another manufacturing process every day between Oct. 29, 2004, and April 15, 2006.

Eli Lilly does not admit the facts or legal conclusions alleged in the original complaint, the settlement said.

 

 

 

 



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • can't you smell that smell
    I fear this will affect Lilly at a time it can least afford an extra bill. However, we all have known for years that the SW portion of Marion County has smelled like sulfur since the beginning of time. We all knew who it was. And, we all have just taken it. At least, we'll hopefully get a cleanup and a more plesant smelling Indy.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

  2. Yes. Blame those who were too lazy to go vote Obama out and those who voted him in again. That's my take on it. I know folks won't get it on the left. OK. Start berating me now!

  3. Serioulsy, people are AGINST this project? Most communities would be salivating over a project like this. You'd rather have an empty eye-sore gas station and shacks posing as apartments? This project is exactly what BR needs. BUILD IT MR MAYOR. And yes, I am a BR resident, and have been for 20 years.

  4. As a St. Vincent employee of over 20 years, I am saddened and disheartened by this announcement. Unfortunately, as the healthcare "industry" continues on this political and corporate path, all that St. Vincent Hospital has stood for spiritually for its employees and this community is being sucked dry. I know it truly has no choice. It is not just Obamacare or just competition or just any single thing. This trend started long before I was even born when the government became involved in healthcare and it became an "industry." I grieve for those who will lose their jobs, one of whom may be me, but I also grieve for this hospital which I have served for over 20 years. May God give us and it the grace to withstand the future of healthcare.

  5. Why do people constantly harp on this issue and act ignorant about what a city population measures? A city's population is the city's population. There is no argument or debate about it. If you want to measure the density of a city--measure it. If you want to measure the size of a metropolitan area, then measure the metropolitan population. City boundaries cover different sized areas--and they always have (though the disparity has probably increased since about 1900 or so when more cities began annexing their surrounding communities). For example, San Francisco only covers 49 square miles while Houston cover nearly 600 square miles. No one argues about the population rankings of either city even though they clearly cover extremely different sized areas. Indianapolis is the 13 largest city by population in the U.S. That is a fact. While the population of a metropolitan area may give you a better sense of how large a community is, as noted, even metro areas can vary widely in the size of geographic area they cover--so that is not a perfect comparison either.

ADVERTISEMENT