IBJNews

U.S. Attorney Hogsett ends mayoral run speculation

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett is ending speculation that he would run for Indianapolis mayor or statewide office in the next couple of years.

The former Indiana secretary of state told The Indianapolis Star that he intends to remain in his position as the top federal prosecutor for much of the state through 2016.

The Democrat says he gave considerable thought to running for political office again but decided against leaving his current job. Hogsett says he wants to focus on improving public safety in Indianapolis and around the state.

Hogsett has maintained a high public profile since President Barack Obama named him as U.S. attorney in 2010.

Republican Indianapolis Mayor Greg Ballard hasn't yet said whether he'll seek a third term in the 2015 election.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Hogsett
    I don't know why people are praising him. Hogsett has really dropped the ball on white collar and political corruption prosecutions. He's turned out to be no better than his predecessors in the U.S. Attorney's Office and they were AWOL on white collar and political corruption prosecutions.
  • Agreed
    I have no problem with Mr. Hogsett, but I would rather see him stay in public safety. Besides, busting meth labs would seem a lot more rewarding than having to deal with all of the ticky-tac political sludge the mayor's office gets stuck with.
  • Do Not Run
    Hopefully Hogsett will stay where he is and continue the good work he's doing. Being Mayor may be good for sound bites and media attention, but we need Hogsett where he is-putting at least some of the bad guys away.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

    2. If you only knew....

    3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

    4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

    5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

    ADVERTISEMENT