USTA confirms local tennis event likely headed to Atlanta

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Tennis Championships officials announced Friday afternoon that they have sold the sanctioning rights for the local tournament back to the ATP Tour.

U.S. Tennis Association officials in New York, meanwhile, confirmed an IBJ report last week that the event is likely headed for Atlanta.

Officials at the USTA, which also owns the U.S. Open, said they already are discussing a deal with the ATP.

“Atlanta is ready, willing and able to host the event in 2010,” Tim Curry, spokesman at USTA’s national headquarters in New York, said Friday. “Now that the ATP has ownership of the event, we’re hoping to get this deal done and have an announcement made by the first quarter of 2010 at the latest.”

Both the USTA national office and its Southern Section in Georgia are in on the deal.

Though financial details of the deal were not released, ITC Director Kevin Martin said the revenue from the sale to the ATP will be enough to pay all the tournament’s outstanding bills with possibly some left over to use for one of the ITC’s charitable causes.

ITC officials said they negotiated with several potential buyers for the purchase of the week-long event, but in the end decided to sell it back to ATP so tournament officials could tie up the event’s finances by year’s end.

Martin cited declines in ticket and sponsorship sales as reasons for the tournament’s eventual demise. He said while the core audience of the event remained strong, corporate entertaining at the event waned, severely hurting the tournament.

Martin said the ATP has not yet decided where the tournament—which is set for the third week in July—will be held in 2010. ATP officials could not be reached for comment.

The ITC traces its roots in Indianapolis back to 1920, when it was held at the Woodstock Country Club.


  • Not so fast, ATL!
    The USTA may say it's going to ATL, but the final say is up to the ATP Tour, which has already had one vote to deny the move to the Southern Section. SportsBusiness Journal report the mood of the ATP is to retire the date and thereby reduce the number of tournaments on the men's calendar. However, the Southern Section is appealing.
  • not up front
    Yes, Kevin Martin is right, it is a sad day. The saddest part about it is, Martin wasn't up front about what was truly going on with the tournament until it was too late. He should have publicly sought help, and he might have been surprised about what corners that help might have come from. Instead he chose to silently soldier on like some kind of martyr. A sad day indeed, but for all the wrong reasons.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

  2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

  3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

  4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

  5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?