IBJNews

Sources: City will lose professional tennis tournament

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The Indianapolis Tennis Championships—formerly known as RCA Championships—appear to be dead, with the ATP Tour dates being shipped off to Atlanta for 2010 and beyond.

Though ITC officials did not return calls seeking comment, two sources within the U.S. Tennis Association confirmed that the USTA’s Southern Section in Georgia is buying the tournament dates from organizers of the Indianapolis tournament. It is not clear what the terms of the deal are.

Tournament organizers that are granted a coveted position on the ATP Tour, the top circuit for male professional tennis players, essentially own those dates on the calendar.

The ATP does have some power to change those dates. The local tournament was hurt in 2003 when ATP officials moved the event from August, where it was a key warm-up to the U.S. Open, to July.

Players like Sam Querrey didn’t draw big crowds to the local ATP Tour event last year. (Associated Press Photo)


The ITC has struggled mightily in recent years, losing its title sponsor, RCA, after the 2006 tournament, along with its television deal with NBC. Perhaps as a result, attendance and revenue have declined.

The event struggled in recent years to meet its annual budget of $3.4 million, which covers a prize purse of about $520,000, player appearance fees and the mounting costs of maintaining and upgrading the aging Indianapolis Tennis Center on the IUPUI campus.

A dearth of U.S. men’s tennis stars in recent years has also hurt the local tournament. Attendance declined from the 1980s and 1990s, when the likes of Jimmy Connors, Pete Sampras and Andre Agassi were regulars and the week-long event drew more than 90,000 spectators. In recent years, attendance fell well below 70,000.

The future of the local tournament has been further muddied by the announcement last year that IUPUI plans to demolish the tennis facility eventually.

 
ITC officials in mid-November said they were awaiting word from a company that was pondering taking over title sponsorship of the tournament, which traces its local roots back more than eight decades.

Officials for Eli Lilly and Co. Inc., which tripled its sponsorship commitment since RCA pulled out, said they wouldn’t be able to commit to the local tennis tournament financially until the first quarter of 2010.

“We’ve been busy with the reorganization of our company,” said Lilly spokeswoman Lauren Cislak. “We’re not in a position to commit to the sponsorship right now.”

Amid speculation the tournament was moving, an Atlanta-based marketing firm, The Forward Agency, recently began soliciting sponsors for a new ATP Tour event this upcoming July on the dates previously held by the Indianapolis event.

Officials for The Forward Agency did not return calls seeking comment, but an online announcement from the firm’s owner, Jason Pritchett, advertised sponsorship opportunities for an ATP tournament to be held at the Atlanta Athletic Club that will be televised on ESPN2 and The Tennis Channel. Both were TV partners of the Indianapolis event in 2009. That announcement has since been pulled.

A source within the USTA said officials for USTA’s Southern Section have been seriously negotiating to buy the dates of the local tournament since the 2009 U.S. Open in late August and early September.

Officials for the USTA’s Midwest Section in Indianapolis said they talked with ITC executives over the last two years about taking an equity stake in the tournament to keep it here.

Mark Saunders, executive director of the USTA Midwest Section, talked to officials at the USTA’s national office about obtaining financial aid to keep the tournament in Indianapolis, but in the end, Saunders said, with the recent economic swoon, the Midwest Section simply couldn’t afford to invest.

Georgia and some of its surrounding states are tennis hotbeds. The Southern Section covers nine states and has more than 170,000 members. It has greater financial resources, USTA officials said, than the Midwest Section, which covers 5-1/2 states and has 84,000 members.

There’s no shortage of people in the local sports and tennis community who think the ITC’s death would hurt the local sports landscape.

“This tournament for years was a unique drawing card for the entire state, and its absence will put a sizable hole in the sports calendar,” said Jim Whipkey, president of the Central Indiana Tennis Association. “You simply can’t replace the type of attention this tournament brought this region with another sporting event. If it’s true, this is a very sad day.”

Sports business expert and former dean at IUPUI Mark Rosentraub is more pragmatic.

“This isn’t surprising,” said Rosentraub, who now works in the School of Urban Affairs at the University of Michigan. “The market has spoken.”

Rosentraub, who has authored two books about professional sports operations, said the disappearance of the ailing tournament could actually be a good thing.

“The focus right now has to be on protecting the large base assets of this community: Conseco Fieldhouse and Lucas Oil Stadium,” Rosentraub said. “Anything that takes consumer dollars away from those assets has to be given lower priority.

“The market in Indianapolis has become saturated. This is a contraction, a market correction. It’s as simple as that.”

Still, it won’t be easy for tennis fans to say goodbye to the tournament, which traces its roots back to the Woodstock Country Club in 1920. It started there as the Western Open before evolving into the U.S. Open Clay Court Championships. That tournament, which featured men and women, became the U.S. Men’s Hardcourt Championships and RCA Championships. The event brought some of the biggest international tennis stars to Indianapolis every year.

From the 1980s up to 2001, the tournament was voted the top ATP Tour event by the players a record-setting 11 times. But as the ATP tweaked its schedule and promoted a summer tournament in Cincinnati to the Masters Series, the highest rung of events outside the Grand Slam, the local tournament began to slide in prestige despite local organizers’ attempts to obtain the same status.

“It’s been a tough situation with the event in Cincinnati,” Whipkey said. “That took a lot of wind out of our sails. And things just started to sink from there.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • ouch
    Indy needs to retain these types of events (tennis, track, cycling, high school events) as diversification is key. The larger venues with the big events last only a few days or perhaps one week. Even the Colts impact is limited to at most 10 weekends a year. What fills the hotels, restaurants and CC mall for the remainder of the year?
  • Market Correction? Hardly.
    I vehemently disagree that this is merely a "market correction." The Colts, Pacers, ISO, etc. were all here at the same time as the tournament. The Colts and Pacers don't even play during the tournament.

    No, the key problems are the city leadership's indifference and the move to July which made it difficult to get more of the top players in the last five years.

    What is striking right now is that there seems to be no city leadership (aside from the tournament director) in trying to get the tournament past what should be a temporary period. Think long term, guys! This is not something that we can retrieve when the economy is better. Once it is gone, it's gone.

  • Sign of the times
    The economy has taken a toll on our city as we deal with the CIB situation and the "major league" sports in our town. Corporate dollars are scarce with the Colts, Pacers, ISO, and other arts organizations. It's spread too thin, and both IUPUI and the city have no interest seeing the event succeed. Indeed, the city will just let it go. As Rosentraub said, a market corrections. A cold assessment, but true.
    • Thanks For The Memories!
      I will really miss the Indianapolis Tennis Championships ... It's been a very special event that has provided a lot of wonderful, lifelong memories:

      10 - It's a law Andy Roddick practices with his shirt off ... I'm just waiting for 1 of these 12-year-old girls to pass out!

      9 - What do you think Janko TipsareviÄ? is really looking at behind those sunglasses? ... It's not even sunny!

      8 - (Yes, this truly was a local radio contest!) Name that moan - Gustavo Kuerten or gay porn?

      7 - Srichaphan ... It's just fun to say: Srichaphan! Paradorn Srichaphan!

      6 - What in the hell is Bud Collins wearing? ... Are those chili peppers on his pants?

      5 - A-Rod? ... You mean Alex Rodriguez is here?

      4 - Fiiiiiiiiiiiish! ... Fiiiiiiiiiiiish! ... Fiiiiiiiiiiiish!

      3 - Jan-Michael Gambill is too pretty to play tennis ... He actually hurts your eyes!

      2 - This crazed fan waving the Israeli flag and yelling incessantly is going to get us shot ... Please protect me Andy Ram!

      1 - Don't look but that's either Colin Farrell or Nicolas Kiefer eating at the table right next to us ... I said don't look!
    • Sad to see...
      Sad to see for all the volunteers who've made this event an awesome success in the past--it is indeed too bad that the city in the end couldn't sustain the event. If this is in fact true, kudos to the staff, volunteers and community that helped make the RCAs and later the ITCs a fun Indy event.
    • What's Next?
      Wow. Apparently even the veneer of class in Indianapolis is leaving. I'm usually an optimist, but this is dreadful. Civic to Carmel, Tennis to Atlanta... Where is the replacement crop of leaders for our city? The vision? The pride? I'm trying to do my part in patronizing that which is local, but I'm not a mover and shaker that can make things happen. Is there another alternative for mayor?

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. liek the rest of America

    2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

    3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

    4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

    5. whoa!

    ADVERTISEMENT