IBJNews

Vera Bradley gives another $10M to IU cancer center

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer has pledged $10 million to fund breast cancer research at the Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center.

The latest gift continues funding from the Fort Wayne based charity, which is an arm of the Vera Bradley handbag company. Three previous gifts from the foundation, dating back to 1998, also totaled $10 million.

“Generosity and commitment like that from the Vera Bradley Foundation are what will make the difference in this disease,” said Dr. Craig Brater, dean of the IU School of Medicine, in a prepared statement. “These gifts touch women every day, not just in Indiana, but all over the world.”

Money from Vera Bradley has helped IU's cancer center hire 10 researchers, increasing its total team to 34. Those 34 researchers have secured other grant funding that brings in more than $10 million every year.

To recognize of the foundation’s past gifts, IU recently named medical research laboratories in its new Walther Hall building after the Vera Bradley Foundation for Breast Cancer.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Tax write off
    I am truly disgusted with Vera Bradley. First they lay off all their employees so they can claim stimulus money on the pretense of hiring more employees, providing more jobs. Instead they hire contract workers so they donâ??t have to provide any benefits. NOW theyâ??re giving money in the name of charityâ?¦I donâ??t think so. There is nothing charitable about a ruthless company that lays off employees with no intention of rehiring just so they can get fat on stimulus money. This must be a tax shelter for them. I wouldn't own their bags if they gave them to me.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT