IBJNews

Voucher students who never tried public school on the rise

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Four in 10 students using vouchers never attended an Indiana public school, even though the original 2011 law that authorized the program required it.

The first year, nearly every student in the program – which uses state funds to send lower-income students to private schools – tried out a public school first.

But two years later – after lawmakers expanded the program to give students more options –about 40 percent have no record of attending an Indiana public school.

The statistics are part of a report produced by the Indiana Department of Education and released Monday. It’s the first wide-ranging statistical analysis of the state’s voucher program.

Currently, Indiana has the nation’s broadest private-school voucher program and it’s becoming broader. It offers tuition assistance to families whose income is 150 percent of the federal free or reduced lunch program or less.

Rep. Todd Huston, R-Fishers, said he supports vouchers because of the choice it gives students and their parents.

Originally, a student had to satisfy one of two eligibility requirements – complete two semesters in public school or receive an award from a previous scholarship-granting organization.

But, last year, the General Assembly added several more ways a student could qualify. Students who have a disability, live in a school district that received an F grade from the state’s accountability system, or have a sibling who received a voucher are eligible for a voucher. Those pathways allow students to attend a private school with a voucher without ever trying public school.

According to the annual report, 5,225 students of the 5,613 who received a voucher would not have been eligible under the two-semester requirement.

1n 2011, 90 percent of the students using vouchers had previously attended public school. That dropped to 60 percent in 2012 after the eligibility requirements broadened.

Rep. Kreg Battles, D-Vincennes, said he is troubled that some students never even give the public school system a chance. He said that constitutionally, the state should focus on public schools.

The income criteria for vouchers are linked to the federal free or reduced lunch program guidelines. A student’s family income can be equal to or below 100 percent of those guidelines to receive a 90-percent scholarship, and below 150 percent to receive a 50-percent scholarship.

That means that a family of four whose income is $43,568 or less could apply for a 90-percent scholarship.That same family, with income $63,352 or below, could apply for a 50-percent scholarship.

Battles said he is overall against the voucher system, but since it is in place, the financial guidelines should be stricter.

Already, state law allows a student to continue to receive a 50-percent voucher even if his family’s income increases to as high as 200 percent of the free and reduced lunch guidelines. That’s $87,135 for a family of four.

“What bothers me, is that (bill) gives you a lifetime privilege of being designated in (the low-income) category and having a voucher to use at a charter school or a traditional school, or one of our private institutions,” said Rep. Vernon Smith, D-Gary prior to the release of the annual report. “We know that your status in life changes.”

The number of Hoosiers using vouchers almost doubled from 2012 to 2013 because the three eligibility paths increased to seven.

In 2011-2012 school year 3,911 students used a voucher to attend a private school. The state paid $15.5 million for scholarships that year.

The maximum amount the state will pay for voucher in the 2013-2014 school years is an estimated $81 million for 19,809 students.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Private Schools should be an earned privilege not a taxpayer forced entitlement
    As a Christian, as well as a Republican, I am confused by other conservatives being in favor of ADDITIONAL ENTITLEMENTS. I was never able to attend a private school growing up. Along with having a nice home, or a nice car, and financial security, affording private school had to be earned through wise life decisions , preparations, and sacrifices. Tax payers are already paying for public education. If there are public schools not meeting the standards of education, clean house. That has got to be cheaper than $81 million. There are plenty of teachers looking for jobs. This is wrong people. What is next? What is on the wish list for those individuals who rely on the hard work of others? In my opinion, this is the Obama way; everyone should have the same, no more, no less , regardless of what it took to have more. Is the path to Communism what we really want?
  • The logic boggles the mind
    So...feeding poor kids is wrong and they shouldn't be dependent on the taxpayer for a necessity as basic as FOOD. But using taxpayer money to send a homeschooled kid to an expensive private school instead is perfectly acceptable? I swear, you guys have turned "fiscal conservative" into an absolute punchline.
  • Everybody Who Said This Would Become A super-highway for tax money to pour into churches
    Can now say "I Told you so!" Now that the scheme is in place, ostensibly at the time to "provide school choice" to students in "failing" public schools, now we see the real users are people who public school has never "failed" because they've never set foot in a public school. Ultimately, this is really about suburban conservatives wanting their kids to attend church and religious schools on the taxpayer dime.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
thisissue1-092914.jpg 092914

Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Cramer agrees...says don't buy it and sell it if you own it! Their "pay to play" cost is this issue. As long as they charge customers, they never will attain the critical mass needed to be a successful on company...Jim Cramer quote.

  2. My responses to some of the comments would include the following: 1. Our offer which included the forgiveness of debt (this is an immediate forgiveness and is not "spread over many years")represents debt that due to a reduction of interest rates in the economy arguably represents consideration together with the cash component of our offer that exceeds the $2.1 million apparently offered by another party. 2. The previous $2.1 million cash offer that was turned down by the CRC would have netted the CRC substantially less than $2.1 million. As a result even in hindsight the CRC was wise in turning down that offer. 3. With regard to "concerned Carmelite's" discussion of the previous financing Pedcor gave up $16.5 million in City debt in addition to the conveyance of the garage (appraised at $13 million)in exchange for the $22.5 million cash and debt obligations. The local media never discussed the $16.5 million in debt that we gave up which would show that we gave $29.5 million in value for the $23.5 million. 4.Pedcor would have been much happier if Brian was still operating his Deli and only made this offer as we believe that we can redevelop the building into something that will be better for the City and City Center where both Pedcor the citizens of Carmel have a large investment. Bruce Cordingley, President, Pedcor

  3. I've been looking for news on Corner Bakery, too, but there doesn't seem to be any info out there. I prefer them over Panera and Paradise so can't wait to see where they'll be!

  4. WGN actually is two channels: 1. WGN Chicago, seen only in Chicago (and parts of Canada) - this station is one of the flagship CW affiliates. 2. WGN America - a nationwide cable channel that doesn't carry any CW programming, and doesn't have local affiliates. (In addition, as WGN is owned by Tribune, just like WTTV, WTTK, and WXIN, I can't imagine they would do anything to help WISH.) In Indianapolis, CW programming is already seen on WTTV 4 and WTTK 29, and when CBS takes over those stations' main channels, the CW will move to a sub channel, such as 4.2 or 4.3 and 29.2 or 29.3. TBS is only a cable channel these days and does not affiliate with local stations. WISH could move the MyNetwork affiliation from WNDY 23 to WISH 8, but I am beginning to think they may prefer to put together their own lineup of syndicated programming instead. While much of it would be "reruns" from broadcast or cable, that's pretty much what the MyNetwork does these days anyway. So since WISH has the choice, they may want to customize their lineup by choosing programs that they feel will garner better ratings in this market.

  5. The Pedcor debt is from the CRC paying ~$23M for the Pedcor's parking garage at City Center that is apprased at $13M. Why did we pay over the top money for a private businesses parking? What did we get out of it? Pedcor got free parking for their apartment and business tenants. Pedcor now gets another building for free that taxpayers have ~$3M tied up in. This is NOT a win win for taxpayers. It is just a win for Pedcor who contributes heavily to the Friends of Jim Brainard. The campaign reports are on the Hamilton County website. http://www2.hamiltoncounty.in.gov/publicdocs/Campaign%20Finance%20Images/defaultfiles.asp?ARG1=Campaign Finance Images&ARG2=/Brainard, Jim

ADVERTISEMENT