WEB REVIEW: Micro-managing your loans online

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Jim Cota

As the credit market tightened in recent years, an interesting trend emerged to serve lending needs for businesses and consumers here and abroad. It’s called micro lending and, in some ways, it’s changing the way people think about lending and borrowing.

Micro lending began as a way for people to offer very small loans to those in poverty. The loans were designed to spur idea generation and entrepreneurship at the local level. The primary goal is to empower people to create something that provides for self-employment and, eventually, wealth accumulation to lift them from poverty to self-sustainment. While examples of the concept of micro lending have been around for centuries, most people attribute the birth of modern microfinance to a bank in Bangladesh in the late 1970s.

With the emergence of the Internet, many of these organizations went online. Probably the best known is Kiva (www.kiva.com). Founded in 2005, Kiva envisions “a world where all people hold the power to create opportunity for themselves and others.” So far, almost 600,000 people made more than $200 million available for loans through Kiva, which boasts a repayment rate of 98.75 percent—which is better than many banks. In one recent week alone, more than $1.6 million has been loaned to 4,000 entrepreneurs. At an average value of $400, it doesn’t seem like much to most of us. But for people living in poverty, it can literally be a lifesaver.

Recently, however, the concept has undergone a bit of a transformation. While many of the originals were not-for-profits like Kiva, micro lending is increasingly becoming a for-profit enterprise, especially as the loans move from poverty-stricken locales into the Western world.

The result has been both good and bad, as you can imagine. But if done correctly, under the right kinds of oversight, the loans can provide a way out for people who need help and an interesting investment opportunity for people looking to get a better return on their money than is currently available in savings accounts, CDs or money markets. One of the changes that made this possible: group lending.

Let’s say your brother needs to borrow $1,000. Instead of you loaning him the money directly, you get nine of your friends to each put in $100. That $900, with your $100, gives him the amount he needs. But the risk of his defaulting is spread over the entire group, which, knowing your brother, makes it more palatable for everyone. With each payment (including interest), all 10 of you receive a small payment. Over time, the entire loan is paid off, all 10 lenders make a little money to offset their risk, and your brother has a clean slate.

Several organizations online allow you to do the same thing with people you don’t even know. Each borrower submits a credit history and a description of what they need. The organization vets the information for accuracy and operates as a middle man to disperse payments all around.

As an individual investor, you can put in as much or as little as you like, and you can determine how much of your money goes to whom, allowing you further leverage to mitigate your risk. Two of the more popular options are Prosper (www.prosper.com) and Lending Club (www.lendingclub.com).

In each case, you can decide whom to lend to, and you’ll see detailed information about who is borrowing, what the money will go toward, and what the payment options are.

You can decide, for example, that you’ll happily loan money to someone to pay off another higher-interest debt but you won’t make the loan to help him buy a motorcycle. It’s entirely up to you. The nice thing about both options is that you put your money into an account you control, you decide how much (and to whom) to lend, and the organization takes care of the rest … for a small fee. Right now, Prosper is offering an actual rate of return above 10 percent. (Keep in mind that I’m not a financial planner, so talk with a professional you trust before you invest in either of these organizations.)

While micro lending is an interesting option for both borrower and lender, even Kiva will tell you it’s not a silver bullet. Rather, it’s one strategy among many to battle a huge problem.

For more information on the impact micro lending is having on poverty, see Freedom from Hunger (www.freedomfromhunger.org).•


Cota is creative director of Rare Bird Inc., a full-service advertising agency specializing in the use of new technologies. His column appears monthly. He can be reached at jim@rarebirdinc.com.


  • Micro-managing
    A financial plan is a blueprint to achieve goals. It should include a thorough assessment of your present financial position and future cash flows. However, the success of this plan depends on the execution – that is, investing the right amount in the right vehicle. To achieve this, you need to have the right asset allocation keeping taxation, liquidity and long-term goals in mind. Asset allocation strategy: Many prefer to use thumb rules for allocating their assets. A popular one is subtracting age from 100. The result is the percentage of equity allocation one should have. However asset allocation is dynamic and should change according to goals, risk profile, investible surplus, and so on. Thus asset allocation varies for different people, in different situations despite being in the same age group.
    Valery from online loans

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Hiking blocks to an office after fighting traffic is not logical. Having office buildings around the loop, 465 and in cities in surrounding counties is logical. In other words, counties around Indianapolis need office buildings like Keystone, Meridian, Michigan Road/College Park and then no need to go downtown. Financial, legal, professional businesses don't need the downtown when Carmel, Fishers, North Indy are building their own central office buildings close to the professionals. The more Hamilton, Boone county attract professionals, the less downtown is relevant. Highrises have no meaning if they don't have adequate parking for professionals and clients. Great for show, but not exactly downtown Chicago, no lakefront, no river to speak of, and no view from highrises of lake Michigan and the magnificent mile. Indianapolis has no view.

  2. "The car count, THE SERIES, THE RACING, THE RATINGS, THE ATTENDANCE< AND THE MANAGEMENT, EVERY season is sub-par." ______________ You're welcome!

  3. that it actually looked a lot like Sato v Franchitti @Houston. And judging from Dario's marble mouthed presentation providing "color", I'd say that he still suffers from his Dallara inflicted head injury._______Considering that the Formula E cars weren't going that quickly at that exact moment, that was impressive air time. But I guess we shouldn't be surprised, as Dallara is the only car builder that needs an FAA certification for their cars. But flying Dallaras aren't new. Just ask Dan Wheldon.

  4. Does anyone know how and where I can get involved and included?

  5. While the data supporting the success of educating our preschoolers is significant, the method of reaching this age group should be multi-faceted. Getting business involved in support of early childhood education is needed. But the ways for businesses to be involved are not just giving money to programs and services. Corporations and businesses educating their own workforce in the importance of sending a child to kindergarten prepared to learn is an alternative way that needs to be addressed. Helping parents prepare their children for school and be involved is a proven method for success. However, many parents are not sure how to help their children. The public is often led to think that preschool education happens only in schools, daycare, or learning centers but parents and other family members along with pediatricians, librarians, museums, etc. are valuable resources in educating our youngsters. When parents are informed through work lunch hour workshops in educating a young child, website exposure to exceptional teaching ideas that illustrate how to encourage learning for fun, media input, and directed community focus on early childhood that is when a difference will be seen. As a society we all need to look outside the normal paths of educating and reaching preschoolers. It is when methods of involving the most important adult in a child's life - a parent, that real success in educating our future workers will occur. The website www.ifnotyouwho.org is free and illustrates activities that are research-based, easy to follow and fun! Businesses should be encouraging their workers to tackle this issue and this website makes it easy for parents to be involved. The focus of preschool education should be to inspire all the adults in a preschooler's life to be aware of what they can do to prepare a child for their future life. Fortunately we now know best practices to prepare a child for a successful start to school. Is the business community ready to be involved in educating preschoolers when it becomes more than a donation but a challenge to their own workers?