WellPoint expects loss of 400,000 insured members this year

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

It’s going to be a year of shrinkage for WellPoint Inc.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer expects to lose 400,000 insured members from its health plans during the year and spend a higher percentage of its premium revenue on paying medical claims.

In fact, WellPoint predicts all of its key growth and profit metrics will decline in 2010 compared with the previous year, according to information filed Wednesday morning with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission.

The current year will be a “challenging” one with U.S. unemployment remaining around 10 percent before improving near the end of 2010, Chief Financial Officer Wayne DeVeydt said on a conference call with analysts.

With more Americans losing health benefits, WellPoint will have to meet its earnings goals largely on the strength of share buybacks, said Jason Nogueira, an analyst at T. Rowe Price Group Inc. of Baltimore.

“It’s a tough backdrop,” Nogueira, whose company owned $865 million in WellPoint shares as of Dec. 31, said. “I think eventually it gets better. Hopefully, the economy gets better and WellPoint should bounce back.”

The forecast doesn’t include the possible impact of federal health care reform, DeVeydt said on the call. The U.S. House may vote this week on an almost $1 trillion overhaul of the health-care system that would place new restrictions on health plans.

WellPoint’s board in January authorized as much as $3.5 billion in share repurchases on top of $2.6 billion bought last year, the company said in its fourth-quarter earnings statement. DeVeydt said the company expects to buy back the full amount in 2010.

The loss of customers stems primarily from WellPoint's employer customers cutting workers and not being quick to rehire them. Those factors chopped 1.4 million people from WellPoint's customers rolls last year. The projected cuts in 2010 would bring WellPoint’s total customer pool down to 33.3 million, which would also slice 3 percent from WellPoint’s operating revenue, to $59 billion.

The company expects net income per share of $6 for the year, compared with $6.09 per share last year. The 2009 total does not include one-time profit WellPoint earned from selling its pharmaceutical benefit management arm, as well as other extraordinary items.

WellPoint’s profit will be squeezed by a rising benefit-expense ratio. The company expects to pay out 84.3 percent of its premium revenue to cover medical claims. Last year, that ratio was 82.6 percent.

The 2010 number now includes money WellPoint spends on nurse hotlines, health and wellness programs, including disease management and medical management, and clinical health policy work.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.