IBJNews

WellPoint, insurance commissioner get earful from lawmakers

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Executives from WellPoint Inc. and the Indiana Department of Insurance both received a grilling Wednesday morning before the Committee on Insurance of the state House of Representatives.

The hearing was called by Committee Chair Rep. Craig Fry, D-Mishawaka, because WellPoint customers buying health coverage on their own will face on average price hike of 21 percent come March 1. Some will see rates spike as much as 34 percent, or, if they have entered a higher age bracket, even higher rates.

Fry and other lawmakers on the committee fired numerous questions at Doug Webber, Indiana's acting insurance commissioner, and at Rob Hillman, president of WellPoint’s Indiana subsidiary, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield. The tiny committee room in the basement of the Indiana Statehouse was filled to standing-room capacity during the nearly two-hour hearing.

With TV news cameras rolling, Fry forced Hillman to defend those increases in light of WellPoint’s 2010 profits that topped $2.5 billion, not including the sale of a pharmacy business, as well as multimillion-dollar lobbying expenses and what Fry called “enormous salaries” for executives.

“I don’t know how you defend that kind of increase,” Fry said. “I understand you guys are in business to make money. … But people can’t afford your product.”

Hillman did defend the increases, blaming medical innovations for constantly driving up costs. On top of that, he said, increasing numbers of healthy people are dropping health insurance, leaving fewer dollars to cover the medical bills of unhealthy people who must keep coverage. That has forced WellPoint to raise rates even faster, he said.

Hillman downplayed the health insurance industry’s profits and executive pay, saying they represent little more than 2 percent of the premiums. But he agreed with Fry that continuing to raise premiums to keep ahead of rising medical costs puts WellPoint’s business in jeopardy.

“The affordability of health care is the biggest risk for our business,” he said, adding, “I firmly believe we are at a tipping point. We may be back here in six months because this problem is not going away. We are on a very bad path right now.”

Before sparring with Hillman, Fry zeroed in on Webber, particularly when the acting commissioner said the Indiana insurance department does not inquire what percentage of premiums Anthem takes as profit.

“Profits aren’t brought into consideration? How do you set rates if you don’t take everything into consideration?” Fry asked.

Webber said the insurance department verifies that Anthem spends at least 55 percent of premiums on medical care, but does not require an accounting of the other 45 percent.

Webber and his chief deputy, Robyn Crosson, emphasized that the Indiana insurance department hires an independent actuary to review each premium increase requested by Anthem—something that the state of California is only now doing to investigate WellPoint’s 25-percent increase in that state.

But Fry objected that the review is done by only one person—and any pushback against Anthem happens behind closed doors. He would prefer an open hearing.

“Wouldn’t that be appropriate when you’re dealing with people’s money?” Fry asked.

After the hearing, Fry said he plans to insert language that would require an open rate-review hearing into Senate Bill 357, which makes various changes to insurance regulations. He said his committee could consider that amendment as early as Thursday.

Fry said he wants “a process that’s more open, not done in the backroom.”

ADVERTISEMENT

  • state employee
    I have Anthem as offered through the state. Might this be a conflict of interest to have approving increase while the state has mutiple employees required to accept Athem if they want insurance?
  • Wow, just wow.
    As someone whose individual premium went up 46% for my January renewal, I have been surprisingly calm. Maybe because I am entering a new age bracket (26 years old) and because they just made certain chemotherapies less expensive lowering the co-pay from 20% down to 0%.

    When $10K a month drugs require a $2K co pay, that's pretty hard to come up with when you're sick. So I can understand why the premium increase could be justified.

    BUT, when I read that Anthem is only required to spend 55% of premiums on actual healthcare, my jaw dropped.

    I thought it was supposed to be much, much higher.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Really, taking someone managing the regulation of Alcohol and making himthe President of an IVY Tech regional campus. Does he have an education background?

  2. Jan, great rant. Now how about you review the report and offer rebuttal of the memo. This might be more conducive to civil discourse than a wild rant with no supporting facts. Perhaps some links to support your assertions would be helpful

  3. I've lived in Indianapolis my whole and been to the track 3 times. Once for a Brickyard, once last year on a practice day for Indy 500, and once when I was a high school student to pick up trash for community service. In the past 11 years, I would say while the IMS is a great venue, there are some upgrades that would show that it's changing with the times, just like the city is. First, take out the bleachers and put in individual seats. Kentucky Motor Speedway has individual seats and they look cool. Fix up the restrooms. Add wi-fi. Like others have suggested, look at bringing in concerts leading up to events. Don't just stick with the country music genre. Pop music would work well too I believe. This will attract more young celebrities to the Indy 500 like the kind that go to the Kentucky Derby. Work with Indy Go to increase the frequency of the bus route to the track during high end events. That way people have other options than worrying about where to park and paying for parking. Then after all of this, look at getting night lights. I think the aforementioned strategies are more necessary than night racing at this point in time.

  4. Talking about congestion ANYWHERE in Indianapolis is absolutely laughable. Sure you may have to wait in 5 minutes of traffic to travel down BR avenue during *peak* times. But that is absolutely nothing compared to actual big cities. Indy is way too suburban to have actual congestion problems. So please, never bring up "congestion" as an excuse to avoid development in Indianapolis. If anything, we could use a little more.

  5. Oh wait. Never mind.

ADVERTISEMENT