WellPoint may be anti-competitive, Connecticut AG says

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

WellPoint Inc.’s Anthem Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut may constrain competition through contracts that require that the insurer receives hospital discounts at least as favorable as any provided to a competitor, according to state Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.

Blumenthal said in a statement Monday that he sent a letter to U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius that his ongoing investigation into Anthem’s use of “Most Favored Nation” clauses in its contracts was a potentially anticompetitive practice that may raise rates.

Even though it has these favorable reimbursement deals, Anthem received approval for premium increases of between 13 percent and 20 percent less than a year ago on individual Connecticut health insurance policies, Blumenthal said.

“As a result of Anthem’s practices, competitors are forced to pay more, hospitals are forced to accept less from Anthem—and consumers are the ones paying,” Blumenthal said in the statement. “Our investigation remains ongoing, but federal officials deserve immediate warning about these practices—potentially having national implications and warranting federal investigation.”

Cheryl Leamon, a spokeswoman for Indianapolis-based WellPoint, the largest insurance provider by membership, did not immediately return a call for comment.

Most-favored nation clauses were banned in Indiana by the General Assembly in 2007.

Wellpoint shares were down 42 cents, or 0.7 percent, to $61.83 each in mid-afternoon trading..

President Barack Obama today pressed his case for an overhaul of the U.S. health-care system, saying insurers keep raising rates because of a lack of competition. Sebelius also sent letters to five health insurance companies, including WellPoint, calling on their chief executives to publicly justify proposed health insurance premium increases, according to a statement from the Department of Health and Human Services.

In January, Blumenthal announced that Anthem had agreed to waive the clauses in contracts with hospitals that threatened to deter them from participating in the Connecticut’s Charter Oak Health Plan for the uninsured.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.