IBJNews

WellPoint rate hikes spark protest in Indianapolis

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Rep. Andre Carson, D-Indiana, will speak Thursday at a protest rally outside WellPoint Inc.’s Indianapolis headquarters.

The organization behind the protest, a janitors union group called Central Indiana Jobs with Justice, wants WellPoint to delay implementing premium increases on individual policies that will average 21 percent in Indiana. Those hikes are scheduled to take effect March 1.

Some customers have complained of increases as high as 39 percent—which could mean hundreds of dollars more per year, according to calculations by Jobs with Justice.

In Indiana, this could mean a more than $100 increase per month for many Hoosiers.

“It is time for WellPoint to stop putting profit before people who depend upon their service,” said Allison Luthe, one of the organizers of the event. “Access to quality health insurance is a right, not an option. At these rates, people will have to choose between making their monthly household payments and keeping their health coverage.”

The rally begins at 9 a.m. on Monument Circle.

In a hearing Wednesday at the Indiana Statehouse, Rob Hillman, president of WellPoint’s Indiana subsidiary, blamed the premium increases on medical innovations that constantly drive up costs. On top of that, he said, increasing numbers of healthy people are dropping health insurance, leaving fewer dollars to cover the medical bills of unhealthy people who must keep coverage. That has forced WellPoint to raise rates even faster, he said.

Hillman downplayed the health insurance industry’s profits and high executive pay, saying they represent little more than 2 percent of the premiums.

A national furor over WellPoint’s rate hikes erupted Feb. 7 when President Obama chastised the company’s plans to raise individual premiums in California by as much as 39 percent. In that state, WellPoint agreed to delay implementation of those increases for two months while state regulators investigate.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT