IBJNews

WellPoint's profit skids, but meets analysts' expectations

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Profit at WellPoint Inc. fell sharply in the fourth quarter but met analysts’ projections, the company announced Wednesday morning.

The Indianapolis-based health insurer earned $148.2 million, or 49 cents per share, during the last three months of the year, a decrease of 68 percent from the same quarter the year before.

A big part of that decline was the $164.5 million after-tax charge WellPoint recorded from the sale of its 1-800-Contacts subsidiary to a private equity firm.

Excluding investment results and other one-time charges, WellPoint would have seen its profit drop 17 percent from a year ago, to $261 million, or 87 cents per share.

On that basis, Wall Street analysts were expecting 87 cents per share, according to a survey by Thomson Reuters.

For all of 2013, WellPoint’s profit fell 6 percent from the previous year, to $2.49 billion. Because of stock repurchases, earnings per share increased by two pennies, to $8.20.

Excluding special charges, WellPoint’s earnings per share rose 13 percent last year, to $8.52. Analysts were expecting full-year profit on that basis of $8.51 per share.

“We are pleased with our performance in 2013, which came in stronger than we expected even as we prepared for the implementation of the Affordable Care Act,” WellPoint CEO Joe Swedish said in a prepared statement.

In the fourth quarter, WellPoint’s revenue grew 16 percent, to $17.9 billion, slightly beating analysts’ expectations. WellPoint saw its membership in its health plans rise by 145,000 people during the quarter.

WellPoint’s 2013 revenue grew nearly 16 percent, to $70.2 billion, as the company enjoyed a full-year of contributions from Amerigroup Corp., the Medicaid managed care subsidiary it acquired near the end of 2012.

Analysts had been expecting revenue of $70.7 billion.

The company said its medical expenses spiked 18 percent in the quarter, to $14.58 billion, due in part to higher use of individual policies in advance of the overhaul's coverage expansions, which unfolded this year.

Insurers typically see a rise in use at the end of each year as patients pay up their deductible, or the out-of-pocket cost before most coverage starts, and then use their coverage before that deductible renews in the new year. But WellPoint said it also saw a jump in use from patients who wanted to take advantage of their policies while they still had them.

At least 4.7 million customers nationwide received notices from their insurers last fall that their plans were being canceled because they didn't meet coverage requirements established under the overhaul, the federal law that aims to cover millions of uninsured people. The actual number is likely much higher because officials in nearly 20 states said they were unable to provide information on cancellation notices or were not tracking it.

The overhaul also provided help to many with canceled coverage by offering income-based tax credits that customers can use to buy a new plan on state-based insurance exchanges that started last fall.

But complaints over the cancellation notices eventually led President Obama to announce that people could keep their individual policies if state regulators approved.

WellPoint spokeswoman Kristin Binns said health care use started climbing after customers received their notices and before the president's November announcement. The insurer runs Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in 14 states, and its biggest market, California, did not allow for plans to be continued.

WellPoint provides individual insurance coverage for about 1.8 million people, or 5 percent of its total medical enrollment of 35.7 million. It did not say how many of its customers received cancellation notices.

In 2014, analysts expect WellPoint’s revenue to surge $3 billion, but they expect profit to decline to $8.39 per share. WellPoint predicted profit of “more than $8.00 per share.”

The insurer also said Wednesday that its board voted to raise WellPoint's quarterly dividend to 43.75 cents per share, up from 37.5 cents.

WellPoint shares closed Tuesday at $84.30 apiece, down 0.7 percent. They have fallen $8.09 per share, or 8.8 percent, since the start of the year.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.

ADVERTISEMENT